California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB915

Introduced
1/9/24  
Introduced
1/9/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Refer
4/1/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Refer
4/11/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Report Pass
4/17/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Refer
4/17/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Report Pass
4/24/24  
Refer
4/24/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
6/3/24  

Caption

Local government: autonomous vehicle service.

Impact

The bill encourages decentralized governance by permitting local jurisdictions to enact ordinances that enforce standards such as vehicle caps, hours of service restrictions, and operating procedures that include safety measures for first responders. Importantly, it also mandates the inclusion of interoperability or override systems in AVs, ensuring that emergency services can efficiently interact with these vehicles in crisis situations, thus prioritizing public safety. Furthermore, the legislation emphasizes the need for AV services to provide accessible options for individuals with disabilities, addressing concerns about equitable transportation access.

Summary

Senate Bill 915, introduced by Senator Cortese, also known as the Autonomous Vehicle Service Deployment and Data Transparency Act (AVS-DDTA), aims to enhance local control over the deployment of autonomous vehicles (AVs) across California. This legislation is a direct response to the increasing prevalence of AV services and the need for better regulation ensuring they operate safely within local jurisdictions. It allows cities and counties, particularly those with populations of 250,000 or greater, to establish ordinances governing AV services, which include permitting processes and safety regulations.

Sentiment

The reception of SB 915 appears mixed. Proponents argue that empowering local governments to regulate AV services better reflects community needs and enhances public safety while preventing potential accidents associated with unregulated AV deployments. Critics, however, express concerns that the bill may lead to inconsistencies between jurisdictions, creating potential operational complexities for AV service providers. Overall, the debate centers on balancing local control with the need for a coherent regulation framework that addresses public safety and accessibility.

Contention

The most notable points of contention include discussions around the adequacy of the state’s current regulatory framework for AVs and the potential for local ordinances to restrict or complicate operations. There is concern that varied local regulations could lead to a fragmented AV market that would hinder the intended goals of integrating innovative transportation solutions within urban environments. Nevertheless, the bill is considered a significant step towards ensuring that AV deployments are thoroughly vetted and managed with respect for local governance and safety standards.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3061

Vehicles: autonomous vehicle incident reporting.

CA SB371

Health information technology.

CA AB687

California Cannabis Authority.

CA SB717

Department of Technology: broadband communications: report.

CA SB1376

Transportation network companies: accessibility for persons with disabilities.

CA AB3261

Cannabis.

AZ SB1333

Neighborhood occupantless electric vehicles

MI SB0530

Insurance: no-fault; treatment and services for injuries; revise limitations on charges. Amends sec. 3157 of 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.3157). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0531'23