California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB994

Introduced
1/31/24  
Introduced
1/31/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Refer
2/21/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Report Pass
5/1/24  
Report Pass
5/1/24  
Engrossed
5/9/24  
Engrossed
5/9/24  
Refer
5/20/24  
Report Pass
6/5/24  
Report Pass
6/5/24  
Enrolled
6/13/24  
Enrolled
6/13/24  
Chaptered
6/26/24  
Chaptered
6/26/24  
Passed
6/26/24  

Caption

Local government: joint powers authority: transfer of authority.

Impact

By authorizing such transfers, SB 994 is expected to simplify governance and operational management within the specified areas of the County of Riverside and the Cities of Moreno Valley and Perris. The bill underscores the necessity of a special statute due to unique regional circumstances, emphasizing that a general statute could not adequately address the operations of multiple public agencies working together under joint powers agreements.

Summary

Senate Bill 994, introduced by Roth, addresses the transfer of authority over local government operations specifically within the context of the March Joint Powers Authority. This legislation aims to streamline the return of jurisdiction related to land use from the March Joint Powers Authority back to the County of Riverside. The bill explicitly permits the transfer of responsibility for landscaping and lighting maintenance districts, as well as community facilities districts, asserting that this is essential for maintaining public infrastructure effectively in the mentioned localities.

Sentiment

Legislative sentiment surrounding SB 994 appears generally supportive, reflecting a recognition of the need for localized authority to manage land use effectively in rapidly developing areas. However, the nuances of transferring powers can evoke discussions around local autonomy and how much governance should be retained at the local versus the joint authority level. Discussions surrounding the bill have raised considerations about resource distribution and operational efficiency.

Contention

While there seems to be a consensus on the need for streamlined processes, points of contention may arise regarding how such transfers could affect local governance and autonomy. Critics might argue that returning these powers could limit broader oversight provided by the joint authority, possibly leading to disparate service levels or governance standards across the localities involved. However, proponents highlight that this change is necessary to ensure the ongoing maintenance of critical infrastructure managed by the local authority.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB98

Planning and zoning: logistics use: truck routes.

CA AB1748

Logistics use projects: sensitive receptors.

CA SB502

Commuter rail systems: availability of automated external defibrillators: Construction Manager/General Contractor Project delivery method: Metrolink commuter rail projects.

CA SB1351

Transportation improvement fee: revenue bonds.

CA SB1196

State Transit Assistance Program: eligibility: Anaheim Transportation Network.

CA AB735

Planning and zoning: logistics use: truck routes.

CA AB840

County transportation commissions: regional transit service: airports.

CA AB442

Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975: exemption: Metropolitan Water District of Southern California: master reclamation plan.