California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1114

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  

Caption

Emergency vehicles: fee and toll exemptions.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1114 would broaden the scope of vehicles eligible for fee exemptions, acknowledging the essential nature of emergency services, whether they are publicly operated or privately owned. The updated provisions would mean that any authorized emergency vehicle displaying the proper identification and license could be exempt from toll charges on various roadway types, including toll highways and high-occupancy toll lanes. This change could enhance the operational efficiency of emergency services, improving response times and access to critical situations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1114, introduced by Assembly Member Vila Faras, seeks to amend provisions within the California Vehicle Code pertaining to fee and toll exemptions for emergency vehicles. The bill aims to extend existing exemptions under the law to vehicles owned by both public and private entities, classifying them as authorized emergency vehicles—this includes vehicles used specifically for firefighting, rescue purposes, or as ambulances. The intent is to ensure that all emergency service vehicles can operate without the financial burden of toll fees during critical responses.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1114 appears to be largely supportive among those who advocate for emergency services. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step toward ensuring that emergency responders can perform their duties without unnecessary financial constraints, which may delay critical life-saving actions. However, some concerns may arise around potential misuse of the exemptions or the implications for toll revenue, leading to a divided opinion among stakeholders, particularly those related to transportation and fiscal policy.

Contention

Opposition to the bill may stem from concerns regarding the financial impact on toll facilities and potential abuse of the exemptions. Additionally, there could be discussions regarding the adequacy of oversight in verifying that the vehicles meet the criteria for exemption, which may lead to questions of accountability. The potential for local agencies to enter agreements with toll operators regarding these exemptions also introduces a layer of complexity in the implementation of the bill, inviting debate on operational protocols and logistical coordination.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1087

Crimes: vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated.

CA SB34

Air pollution: South Coast Air Quality Management District: mobile sources: public seaports.

CA SB348

State Air Resources Board: Low Carbon Fuel Standard.

CA AB1106

State Air Resources Board: regional air quality incident response program.

CA SB358

Mitigation Fee Act: mitigating vehicular traffic impacts.

CA SB364

Outdoor advertising displays: permits: new alignments.

CA AB555

Air resources: regulatory impacts: transportation fuel costs.

NV SB426

Establishes provisions relating to the Lake TahoeBasin Scenic Byway Corridor Recreation Safety Zone. (BDR43-374)