California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1224

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
3/17/25  
Refer
3/18/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Engrossed
5/5/25  
Refer
5/6/25  

Caption

Teacher credentialing: substitute teachers: days of service.

Impact

The implementation of AB 1224 will have a significant effect on state educational policies regarding staffing solutions for schools facing teacher shortages. By permitting local educational agencies that have collective bargaining agreements to reestablish this 60-day limit, the bill seeks to provide educational institutions with more flexibility to address gaps in substitute teaching. This change is anticipated to enhance the availability of qualified substitutes which, in turn, could improve educational outcomes in the context of a tight labor market for teachers.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1224, introduced by Assembly Member Valencia, addresses teacher credentialing specifically focusing on substitute teachers and their service days. This bill aims to indefinitely extend the authorization for holders of substitute teaching permits to serve in a specific assignment for up to 60 cumulative days. Previously, such an authorization was temporary and set to expire by July 1, 2024. The bill simultaneously allows local educational agencies, upon meeting certain conditions, to utilize substitutes effectively to mitigate staffing shortages across the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1224 appears to be supportive among those who acknowledge the ongoing challenges related to the recruitment and retention of substitute teachers. Advocates assert that this bill represents a necessary adaptation to ensure that schools can effectively meet student needs despite these shortages. However, there may be some concerns regarding the potential for over-reliance on substitutes which could affect the quality of education.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 1224 include discussions on whether extending the time frame allowed for substitutes aligns with educational standards and the potential for negative impacts on student learning if qualified substitutes are not adequately trained. Additionally, critics could raise concerns regarding how this might affect negotiations between educational agencies and employee organizations concerning staffing practices and professional development.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1945

Education: School employees: fingerprinting.

CA AB3149

Substitute teachers: Teaching Permit for Statutory Leave: expanded pathways.

CA SB1456

School employment: Sexual Abuse-Free Education (SAFE) Act.

CA AB1982

Teacher credentialing: basic skills proficiency test: exemption.

CA AB1078

Certificated school employees: permanent status.

CA AB1433

Public contracts: school facility projects.

CA AB312

School safety: Safe-To-Tell Program.

CA AB2128

School employees: dismissal or suspension: hearings: evidence.