California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1251

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/10/25  

Caption

Job postings.

Impact

The implementation of AB 1251 would amend existing laws by necessitating stricter compliance regarding the information presented in job postings. As a result, businesses may need to revise their hiring practices and ensure that they clearly communicate the nature of job vacancies. The penalties set forth will also contribute to the Labor Enforcement and Compliance Fund, which will assist in administering and enforcing the provisions of this bill. This change promotes greater accountability among employers within California.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1251 aims to enhance transparency in job postings by requiring private employers to disclose if a job advertised is for an existing vacancy. This requirement is aimed to ensure potential applicants are aware of the job’s status before they apply, thereby fostering trust in the hiring process. Complaints against employers who fail to comply can be investigated by the Labor Commissioner, who can impose civil penalties ranging from $100 to $10,000 per violation. The bill underscores the importance of clarity in employment opportunities and aims to deter misleading practices in job advertisements.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 1251 appears to be supportive among labor advocates and employment agencies who view it as a positive step to protect job seekers. However, it may face pushback from certain business groups concerned about additional regulatory burdens. The discussion on this bill highlights a growing emphasis on labor standards and fair employment practices, reflecting broader societal issues related to work equality and transparency.

Contention

Some points of contention surrounding AB 1251 relate to the extent of regulatory oversight it introduces and the potential burden it places on businesses. While proponents argue that these measures will safeguard job seekers and promote fair labor practices, opponents may argue that the additional compliance requirements could discourage hiring and create administrative challenges for smaller companies. Balancing regulatory needs and economic viability remains a crucial element of the ongoing legislative debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3028

Relating to regulation of certain conduct by discount health care program operators, or concerning discount health care programs, that relates to prescription drugs or prescription drug benefits; authorizing administrative and civil penalties.

TX SB1142

Relating to regulation of discount drug card program operators; authorizing administrative and civil penalties; authorizing fees; expanding a registration requirement.

TX SB2339

Relating to the regulation of discount health care programs by the Texas Department of Insurance; providing penalties.

CA SB354

Insurance Consumer Privacy Protection Act of 2025.

CA AB1507

Financial institutions.

CA AB843

Health care coverage: language access.

TX SB215

Relating to the transfer of driver and traffic safety education from the Texas Education Agency to the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation; changing the amounts of certain fees.

TX HB1786

Relating to the transfer of driver and traffic safety education from the Texas Education Agency and the Department of Public Safety to the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation; changing the amounts of certain fees.