California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1312

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  

Caption

Hospital pricing.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1312 would significantly influence hospital billing practices by establishing a standardized process for determining eligibility for charity care and discounts. Hospitals would be required to adjust billing statements for patients identified as being presumptively eligible before the patients receive the bills. This would likely ensure that more financially vulnerable populations gain access to necessary healthcare services without the burden of excessive charges. The legislation will require hospitals to implement consistent prescreening procedures and provide clear notifications regarding eligibility determinations to patients.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1312, introduced by Assembly Member Schiavo, seeks to amend the Health and Safety Code regarding hospital pricing practices related to charity care and discount payment policies. The bill mandates hospitals to prescreen patients for presumptive eligibility for charity care based on various criteria, including enrollment in specific assistance programs like CalFresh or Medi-Cal. Additionally, this bill requires hospitals to automatically determine a patient's eligibility based on predefined parameters, ensuring that individuals who meet certain socioeconomic conditions receive financial consideration in their healthcare billing.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 1312 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among advocacy groups focused on healthcare accessibility. Proponents argue that the bill will reduce barriers to healthcare access for low-income individuals and ensure that patients are informed about their rights to charity care and discounted services. However, there may be some concerns from healthcare providers regarding the practicality and financial implications of mandated changes in billing processes, as well as the administrative burden associated with implementing these new requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention exist regarding the implementation of prescreening processes by hospitals. Some stakeholders may express concerns about the potential costs associated with adopting new procedures and utilizing third-party software for eligibility assessments. There could also be debates over whether the established income thresholds for presumptive eligibility are sufficient or too restrictive, thereby impacting the effectiveness of the charity care offered to those who need it most. The legislation's success will hinge on whether hospitals can balance the financial aspects with their obligations to serve patient populations effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1474

Death penalty serious mental illness

CT SB01084

An Act Concerning Delays In Medicaid Application Processing.

CO HB1256

Modifications To Civil Involuntary Commitment

NH HB701

Relative to the terminal patients' right to try act.

CA AB2766

Vehicles: retirement and replacement.

CA AB745

Air pollution: Clean Cars 4 All Program.

CA AB1585

Name changes: copies of order granting petition.

CA AB2125

Judicial officers: disqualification.