California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1398

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/28/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/3/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Refer
6/18/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  
Refer
7/9/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  

Caption

Workers’ compensation.

Impact

If enacted, AB 1398 would impose stricter requirements on physicians, medical service providers, and other interested parties to disclose financial relationships when making medical referrals. By changing the definition of a crime regarding financial interest disclosures, the bill not only clarifies obligations for disclosure but also stresses the importance of ethical practices in the healthcare industry. Additionally, the bill specifies that there will be no state reimbursement for costs incurred by local agencies due to the mandated disclosures, implying a cost-shifting aspect for implementation.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1398, introduced by Assembly Member Valencia, seeks to amend Section 139.32 of the Labor Code, focusing on regulations related to workers compensation. The existing law prohibits physicians from referring patients for specific medical services if they have a financial interest in the entities receiving those referrals unless certain exceptions apply. AB 1398 aims to strengthen this framework by requiring all parties involved in a referral to disclose any financial interests associated with such referrals, thereby promoting transparency within the medical referral process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1398 is generally supportive of increased transparency and accountability in the workers compensation system. Advocates see it as a necessary measure to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that medical decisions are made in the best interest of the patient, rather than for financial gain. However, some stakeholders express concern about potential administrative burdens this bill may impose, particularly on smaller medical practices that might struggle with the additional disclosure requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of increased compliance costs and administrative responsibilities for healthcare providers. Critics argue that the bill may inadvertently lead to less accessible medical care for workers due to potential reluctance on the part of providers to accept workers compensation cases. The balance between maintaining ethical standards in medical referrals and ensuring that injured workers have access to necessary medical care will be central to the discussion surrounding AB 1398.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB636

Workers’ compensation: utilization review.

CA AB3066

Workers’ compensation: privacy.

CA SB1205

Workers’ compensation: medical treatment.

CA AB1239

Workers’ compensation: disability payments.

CA SB623

Workers’ compensation: post-traumatic stress disorder.

CA AB597

Workers’ compensation: first responders: post-traumatic stress.

CA AB489

Workers’ compensation: disability payments.

CA AB1107

Workers’ compensation: presumptive injuries.

CA AB1278

Workers’ compensation: medical provider networks.

CA AB1145

Workers’ compensation.

Similar Bills

CA AB890

Nurse practitioners: scope of practice: practice without standardized procedures.

CA SB1237

Nurse-midwives: scope of practice.

CA AB2682

Nurse-midwives: naturopathic doctors: alternative birth centers.

MS HB1126

Transgender procedures; restrict for persons under age 21.

MS HB1258

Gender Transition Procedures; prohibit for persons under age twenty-one.