California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1445

Introduced
2/21/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
3/28/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/24/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/23/25  

Caption

Downtown revitalization and economic recovery financing districts.

Impact

The proposed legislation seeks to empower local governments to establish their districts similar to those that already exist in San Francisco, thus broadening the scope for addressing housing needs. By doing so, it allows additional municipalities to leverage tax revenues from conversion projects, enabling them to reinvest in local infrastructure and community programs. Furthermore, the bill mandates labor standards for projects opting in for funding, including the requirement to pay prevailing wages, thus ensuring fair compensation for workers involved in these developments.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1445, introduced by Assembly Member Haney, aims to amend existing laws regarding the establishment of downtown revitalization and economic recovery financing districts across California. The bill specifically permits cities and counties, excluding San Francisco, to create such districts. These districts are designed to finance commercial-to-residential conversion projects through the allocation of incremental tax revenues generated by the projects within those districts. This legislative move intends to address housing shortages and stimulate economic growth by repurposing underutilized commercial properties into residential units.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding AB 1445 seems generally positive within the local government and development sectors, viewed as a crucial step toward solving housing crises and revitalizing downtowns. However, concerns may arise from labor groups who will be closely watching the implementation of wage standards and other labor protections. Advocates for affordable housing argue that such measures should ensure that a significant portion of converted units remain affordable for lower-income residents, aligning with broader housing policy objectives.

Contention

A potential point of contention lies in the effectiveness of the proposed financing mechanism and whether it will generate sufficient tax incremental revenues to sustain such projects over time. Questions regarding the sustainability of these financing districts and their impacts on local budgets could emerge, particularly regarding the longer-term financial planning and allocations needed to support both the initial setups and ongoing operational costs of the districts. Moreover, ensuring compliance with labor standards could pose an administrative burden for local governments seeking to implement these districts effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2488

Downtown revitalization and economic recovery financing districts: City and County of San Francisco.

CA SB1227

Real property development: San Francisco: downtown revitalization zone: welfare tax exemption and California Environmental Quality Act exemption and streamlining.

VT H0412

An act relating to land use and housing development

VT S0102

An act relating to land use and housing development

CT HB07361

An Act Concerning The Adoption Of Master Plans By Tax Increment Districts.

CT SB00677

An Act Establishing Tax Increment Financing Districts.

CA AB1938

Traffic safety: speed limits.

MN HF2274

Individual income and corporate franchise taxes, property taxes, local government aids, sales and use taxes, tax increment financing, special local taxes, and other various taxes and tax-related provisions modified; various tax refunds and credits modified; reports required; and money appropriated.