California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1501

Introduced
2/24/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Report Pass
4/29/25  
Refer
5/1/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  

Caption

Physician assistants and podiatrists.

Impact

One significant change proposed in AB1501 is the amendment of various fees associated with the licensing of podiatrists and physician assistants. The biennial license renewal fee for podiatrists would increase from $1,318 to $1,950, while fees for physician assistants would rise from $300 to $500. Additionally, the application fees for both categories also see substantial increases. This adjustment may impact the financial burden on practitioners, reflecting the state's effort to provide adequate funding for regulatory oversight but potentially raising concerns among professionals about affordability.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1501 aims to amend sections of the Business and Professions Code related to physician assistants and podiatrists in California. The primary purpose of the bill is to extend the operation of the Podiatric Medical Board and the Physician Assistant Board until January 1, 2030. This action is motivated by the intent of the California Legislature to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of these boards through the legislative sunset review process. The bill intends to ensure continued oversight and regulation of the profession, maintaining standards in the medical field.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB1501 appears generally supportive, particularly among legislators aiming to ensure the effective functioning of medical regulatory boards in California. By extending these boards' functions, the bill demonstrates a commitment to upholding professional standards. However, the proposed fee increases may elicit mixed responses, as professionals may view them as an additional obstacle in an already challenging economic landscape.

Contention

Critics may argue that the raised fees could disproportionately affect new practitioners or those in less profitable practices, potentially dissuading individuals from entering the fields of podiatry or physician assistance. Moreover, the classification of podiatrists as not being ancillary providers in healthcare settings could catalyze discussions around healthcare reimbursement structures, ensuring podiatrists are recognized appropriately within those systems. The balance between sufficient funding for oversight and the accessibility of professions could be a focal point of contention as AB1501 moves forward.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB798

Healing arts: boards.

CA AB1153

Podiatry.

CA SB806

Healing arts.

CA SB815

Healing arts.