California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1640

Introduced
1/27/26  
Refer
3/2/26  
Report Pass
3/2/26  
Refer
3/3/26  
Report Pass
3/25/26  
Refer
3/25/26  
Report Pass
4/8/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/26/26  
Refer
5/27/26  

Caption

California Restaurant Reservation AntiPiracy Act.

Impact

Should AB 1640 be enacted, it would create a clearer framework around how restaurant reservations can be handled legally, introducing a civil penalty for violations not exceeding one thousand dollars per occurrence. The Attorney General, along with county and city attorneys, would be empowered to enforce this law, allowing harmed individuals or entities to pursue damages, including attorney fees and injunctive relief. By establishing the California Restaurant Reservation AntiPiracy Act Fund, collected civil penalties would provide a financial mechanism for further administrative enforcement of the act.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1640, known as the California Restaurant Reservation AntiPiracy Act, seeks to amend the Business and Professions Code to regulate the reservation practices of restaurants more stringently. Specifically, the bill prohibits individuals from selling or facilitating the sale of a restaurant reservation for an amount greater than what they initially paid unless they have a written agreement with the respective restaurant. This act is intended to curb practices that exploit restaurant reservations, which are often resold at inflated prices, thus protecting consumers and maintaining fairness in the marketplace.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1640 appears to be largely supportive among consumer advocacy groups who argue that it offers necessary protections for diners against exploitative practices in the reservation market. However, some stakeholders within the restaurant industry might express concerns over the implications of additional regulations, fearing it could introduce complications in managing their reservation systems or limit legitimate promotional practices that could benefit certain customers.

Contention

Notably, there are potential points of contention within AB 1640. Opponents may argue that while the bill addresses critical issues, it could unintentionally hamstring smaller restaurants that rely on flexible reservation management strategies. Furthermore, concerns may arise regarding the definition of 'clearly and conspicuously' in terms of notifications provided by platforms that deal with reservations, as the bill proposes changing font sizes for disclosures—a stipulation that some may consider unnecessary or burdensome in practice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA HB2456

RESTAURANT RESERVATION PIRACY

CA HB90

Provides relative to preventing restaurant reservation fraud

CA S1193

Bans unauthorized restaurant reservation arrangement by third-party reservation service.

CA SB102

Relating To Restaurants.

CA S1197

Bans unauthorized restaurant reservation arrangement by third-party reservation service.

CA A3318

Bans unauthorized restaurant reservation arrangement by third-party reservation service.

CA H7846

Prohibits unauthorized placement of merchants on advertising platform order interfaces, and would prohibit third-party restaurant reservation services.

CA S2781

Prohibits unauthorized placement of merchants on advertising platform order interfaces, and would prohibit third-party restaurant reservation services.

CA AB1245

State contracts: certification process: forced labor and human trafficking.

CA AB671

Accelerated restaurant building plan approval: California Retail Food Code: tenant improvements.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.