California Assembly Bill AB1932

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/13/26
• Refer: 3/16/26
• Report Pass: 4/13/26
• Refer: 4/14/26
• Report Pass: 4/15/26
• Refer: 4/20/26
• Report Pass: 4/22/26
• Refer: 4/22/26

Caption

Department of Social Services: C.R.I.S.E.S. Grant Pilot Program.

Impact

The bill seeks to enhance public social services by allowing for the development and funding of community-based emergency response systems. By extending the C.R.I.S.E.S. Grant Pilot Program, the legislation aims to address gaps in emergency services and promote effective crisis intervention strategies that prioritize community engagement. Furthermore, this initiative not only seeks to support historically marginalized populations but also aims to reduce the reliance on law enforcement, thereby addressing potential issues related to police use of force and racial profiling.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1932, introduced by Assembly Member Elhawary, aims to extend the Community Response Initiative to Strengthen Emergency Systems (C.R.I.S.E.S.) Grant Pilot Program until June 30, 2032. This bill mandates the State Department of Social Services to oversee the program's implementation and to allocate grants to community-based organizations that provide alternatives to law enforcement in various crisis situations such as mental health and substance use emergencies. The legislation underscores the importance of local community responses, which may include mobile crisis teams, to better serve communities in need without relying solely on traditional law enforcement methods.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1932 is generally positive among proponents who view it as an essential step toward improving emergency response services. Supporters emphasize that investing in community-based organizations can lead to more humane and effective crisis responses. However, there may be contention among some lawmakers and stakeholders regarding the adequacy of funding and resources required to implement the program effectively, as well as concerns over whether these alternatives will adequately address all types of emergencies that typically require law enforcement involvement.

Contention

One notable point of contention includes the balance between community-based solutions and the role of law enforcement. While proponents assert that alternatives to law enforcement will better serve individuals in crisis, critics may question whether community organizations possess the capacity and resources necessary to handle more severe situations that could potentially involve violence or legal issues. The bill also raises discussions about accountability, oversight, and the effective use of public funds in a system traditionally dominated by law enforcement agencies.