California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB240

Introduced
1/14/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Report Pass
3/10/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Report Pass
3/10/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Report Pass
3/10/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/19/25  

Caption

Community colleges: study: Counties of Amador, Alpine, Mariposa, Modoc, and Sierra.

Impact

The legislation intends to amend the existing Education Code by establishing a new mandate that all territories in California, including those currently underserved by community colleges, must either be included in a community college district or provided with equivalent educational opportunities. This change could lead to increased enrollment and participation rates in community college programs, particularly for residents of the affected counties who have historically faced barriers to access due to geographical constraints.

Summary

Assembly Bill 240, introduced by Assembly Member Alanis, aims to assess and improve community college services in several underserved counties, specifically Amador, Alpine, Mariposa, Modoc, and Sierra. The bill requires the Milton Marks Little Hoover Commission to conduct a study and prepare a report evaluating the current provisions of community college services in these areas. This initiative arises from the recognition that residents of these counties do not have adequate access to postsecondary educational opportunities compared to other similarly populated regions within California.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 240 is generally supportive, especially among advocates for educational equity. Proponents argue that enhancing access to community colleges in underserved regions is critical for ensuring that all Californians have equal opportunities for higher education and skill development. However, there may also be concerns regarding the feasibility of implementing the recommendations from the study and ensuring adequate funding for expanded educational services.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the practical challenges of expanding community college services to rural areas where resources may be limited. Additionally, there is potential debate over how to effectively fund the proposals outlined in the impending report and the implications for local educational funding structures. The bill's requirement for a comprehensive study suggests that there will be an ongoing examination of these issues and the diverse educational needs of California's rural populations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1222

Community colleges: study: Counties of Amador, Alpine, Mariposa, Modoc, and Sierra.

CA SB638

California Education and Workforce Development Coordinating Entity: Career Technical Education and Career Pathways Grant Program.

CA SB395

Excise tax: electronic cigarettes: Health Careers Opportunity Grant Program: Small and Rural Hospital Relief Program.

CA SB737

California Student Opportunity and Access Program.

CA SB40

Health care workforce development: California Medicine Scholars Program.

CA AB1929

Career technical education: data collection.

CA AB23

Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development: Business Workforce Coordination Unit.

CA AB2819

Student Opportunity and Access Program.