California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB340 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Amended IN Assembly March 05, 2025 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 340Introduced by Assembly Member AhrensJanuary 28, 2025An act to amend Sections 3506.5, 3519, 3543.5, and 3571 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 28858 of the Public Utilities add Section 3558.9 to the Government Code, relating to employer-employee relations. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 340, as amended, Ahrens. Employer-employee relations: confidential communications. Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including including, among others, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, and provisions relating to higher education, and provisions relating to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law.This bill would also prohibit a local public agency employer, a state employer, a public school employer, a higher education employer, or the district public employer from questioning any employee or employee representative a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. The bill would also prohibit a public employer from compelling a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose those confidential communications to a third party. The bill would not apply to a criminal investigation or when a public safety officer is under investigation and certain circumstances exist.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 3558.9 is added to the Government Code, to read:3558.9. (a) (1) A public employer shall not question a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(2) Paragraph (1) is intended to be consistent with, and not in conflict with, William S. Hart Union High School District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2595.(b) A public employer shall not compel a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose to a third party, communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), this section does not apply to a criminal investigation and does not supersede Section 3303.SECTION 1.The Legislature finds and declares the following:(a)It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this act, to establish an employee-union representative privilege in the context of California public employment.(b)As with the attorney-client privilege, there is a strong interest in encouraging an employee accused of wrongdoing to communicate fully and frankly with their union representative, in order to receive accurate advice about the disciplinary process. The expectation of confidentiality is critical to the employee-union representative privilege. Without confidentiality, union members would be hesitant to be fully forthcoming with their representatives, detrimentally impacting a union representatives ability to advise and represent union members with questions or problems.(c)This employee-labor organization representative privilege is intended to extend to communications made in confidence, in connection with representation relating to concerted activities, including, but not limited to, anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings, between an employee and their recognized labor organization representative, and where the representative is acting in their official representative capacity.(d)This privilege does not extend to criminal investigations, but does prohibit the employing agency from compelling any disclosures, including to third parties.(e)It is the intent of the legislature to supersede American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior Court, 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003).SEC. 2.Section 3506.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3506.5.A public agency shall not do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.(b)Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(d)Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.SEC. 3.Section 3519 of the Government Code is amended to read:3519.It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b)Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.(d)Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.SEC. 4.Section 3543.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3543.5.It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b)Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. (d)Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).SEC. 5.Section 3571 of the Government Code is amended to read:3571.It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b)Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(d)Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).(g)Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.SEC. 6.Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code is amended to read:28858.It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.(b)Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(d)Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.
1+CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 340Introduced by Assembly Member AhrensJanuary 28, 2025 An act to amend Sections 3506.5, 3519, 3543.5, and 3571 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to employer-employee relations. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 340, as introduced, Ahrens. Employer-employee relations: confidential communications. Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, provisions relating to higher education, and provisions relating to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law.This bill would also prohibit a local public agency employer, a state employer, a public school employer, a higher education employer, or the district from questioning any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares the following:(a) It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this act, to establish an employee-union representative privilege in the context of California public employment.(b) As with the attorney-client privilege, there is a strong interest in encouraging an employee accused of wrongdoing to communicate fully and frankly with their union representative, in order to receive accurate advice about the disciplinary process. The expectation of confidentiality is critical to the employee-union representative privilege. Without confidentiality, union members would be hesitant to be fully forthcoming with their representatives, detrimentally impacting a union representatives ability to advise and represent union members with questions or problems.(c) This employee-labor organization representative privilege is intended to extend to communications made in confidence, in connection with representation relating to concerted activities, including, but not limited to, anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings, between an employee and their recognized labor organization representative, and where the representative is acting in their official representative capacity.(d) This privilege does not extend to criminal investigations, but does prohibit the employing agency from compelling any disclosures, including to third parties.(e) It is the intent of the legislature to supersede American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior Court, 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003).SEC. 2. Section 3506.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3506.5. A public agency shall not do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.(b) Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.SEC. 3. Section 3519 of the Government Code is amended to read:3519. It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.SEC. 4. Section 3543.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3543.5. It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. (c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).SEC. 5. Section 3571 of the Government Code is amended to read:3571. It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).(f)(g) Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.SEC. 6. Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code is amended to read:28858. It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.(b) Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.
22
3- Amended IN Assembly March 05, 2025 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 340Introduced by Assembly Member AhrensJanuary 28, 2025An act to amend Sections 3506.5, 3519, 3543.5, and 3571 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 28858 of the Public Utilities add Section 3558.9 to the Government Code, relating to employer-employee relations. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 340, as amended, Ahrens. Employer-employee relations: confidential communications. Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including including, among others, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, and provisions relating to higher education, and provisions relating to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law.This bill would also prohibit a local public agency employer, a state employer, a public school employer, a higher education employer, or the district public employer from questioning any employee or employee representative a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. The bill would also prohibit a public employer from compelling a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose those confidential communications to a third party. The bill would not apply to a criminal investigation or when a public safety officer is under investigation and certain circumstances exist.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
3+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 340Introduced by Assembly Member AhrensJanuary 28, 2025 An act to amend Sections 3506.5, 3519, 3543.5, and 3571 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to employer-employee relations. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 340, as introduced, Ahrens. Employer-employee relations: confidential communications. Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, provisions relating to higher education, and provisions relating to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law.This bill would also prohibit a local public agency employer, a state employer, a public school employer, a higher education employer, or the district from questioning any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: NO
44
5- Amended IN Assembly March 05, 2025
65
7-Amended IN Assembly March 05, 2025
6+
7+
88
99 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION
1010
1111 Assembly Bill
1212
1313 No. 340
1414
1515 Introduced by Assembly Member AhrensJanuary 28, 2025
1616
1717 Introduced by Assembly Member Ahrens
1818 January 28, 2025
1919
20-An act to amend Sections 3506.5, 3519, 3543.5, and 3571 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 28858 of the Public Utilities add Section 3558.9 to the Government Code, relating to employer-employee relations.
20+ An act to amend Sections 3506.5, 3519, 3543.5, and 3571 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to employer-employee relations.
2121
2222 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2323
2424 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2525
26-AB 340, as amended, Ahrens. Employer-employee relations: confidential communications.
26+AB 340, as introduced, Ahrens. Employer-employee relations: confidential communications.
2727
28- Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including including, among others, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, and provisions relating to higher education, and provisions relating to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law.This bill would also prohibit a local public agency employer, a state employer, a public school employer, a higher education employer, or the district public employer from questioning any employee or employee representative a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. The bill would also prohibit a public employer from compelling a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose those confidential communications to a third party. The bill would not apply to a criminal investigation or when a public safety officer is under investigation and certain circumstances exist.
28+ Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, provisions relating to higher education, and provisions relating to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law.This bill would also prohibit a local public agency employer, a state employer, a public school employer, a higher education employer, or the district from questioning any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
2929
30- Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including including, among others, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, and provisions relating to higher education, and provisions relating to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law.
30+ Existing law that governs the labor relations of public employees and employers, including the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, provisions relating to public schools, provisions relating to higher education, and provisions relating to the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, prohibits employers from taking certain actions relating to employee organization, including imposing or threatening to impose reprisals on employees, discriminating or threatening to discriminate against employees, or otherwise interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees because of their exercise of their guaranteed rights. Those provisions of existing law further prohibit denying to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by existing law.
3131
32-This bill would also prohibit a local public agency employer, a state employer, a public school employer, a higher education employer, or the district public employer from questioning any employee or employee representative a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. The bill would also prohibit a public employer from compelling a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose those confidential communications to a third party. The bill would not apply to a criminal investigation or when a public safety officer is under investigation and certain circumstances exist.
32+This bill would also prohibit a local public agency employer, a state employer, a public school employer, a higher education employer, or the district from questioning any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
3333
3434 ## Digest Key
3535
3636 ## Bill Text
3737
38-The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 3558.9 is added to the Government Code, to read:3558.9. (a) (1) A public employer shall not question a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(2) Paragraph (1) is intended to be consistent with, and not in conflict with, William S. Hart Union High School District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2595.(b) A public employer shall not compel a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose to a third party, communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), this section does not apply to a criminal investigation and does not supersede Section 3303.SECTION 1.The Legislature finds and declares the following:(a)It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this act, to establish an employee-union representative privilege in the context of California public employment.(b)As with the attorney-client privilege, there is a strong interest in encouraging an employee accused of wrongdoing to communicate fully and frankly with their union representative, in order to receive accurate advice about the disciplinary process. The expectation of confidentiality is critical to the employee-union representative privilege. Without confidentiality, union members would be hesitant to be fully forthcoming with their representatives, detrimentally impacting a union representatives ability to advise and represent union members with questions or problems.(c)This employee-labor organization representative privilege is intended to extend to communications made in confidence, in connection with representation relating to concerted activities, including, but not limited to, anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings, between an employee and their recognized labor organization representative, and where the representative is acting in their official representative capacity.(d)This privilege does not extend to criminal investigations, but does prohibit the employing agency from compelling any disclosures, including to third parties.(e)It is the intent of the legislature to supersede American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior Court, 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003).SEC. 2.Section 3506.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3506.5.A public agency shall not do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.(b)Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(d)Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.SEC. 3.Section 3519 of the Government Code is amended to read:3519.It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b)Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.(d)Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.SEC. 4.Section 3543.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3543.5.It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b)Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. (d)Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).SEC. 5.Section 3571 of the Government Code is amended to read:3571.It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b)Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(d)Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).(g)Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.SEC. 6.Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code is amended to read:28858.It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:(a)Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.(b)Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(d)Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.(e)Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.(f)Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.
38+The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares the following:(a) It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this act, to establish an employee-union representative privilege in the context of California public employment.(b) As with the attorney-client privilege, there is a strong interest in encouraging an employee accused of wrongdoing to communicate fully and frankly with their union representative, in order to receive accurate advice about the disciplinary process. The expectation of confidentiality is critical to the employee-union representative privilege. Without confidentiality, union members would be hesitant to be fully forthcoming with their representatives, detrimentally impacting a union representatives ability to advise and represent union members with questions or problems.(c) This employee-labor organization representative privilege is intended to extend to communications made in confidence, in connection with representation relating to concerted activities, including, but not limited to, anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings, between an employee and their recognized labor organization representative, and where the representative is acting in their official representative capacity.(d) This privilege does not extend to criminal investigations, but does prohibit the employing agency from compelling any disclosures, including to third parties.(e) It is the intent of the legislature to supersede American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior Court, 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003).SEC. 2. Section 3506.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3506.5. A public agency shall not do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.(b) Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.SEC. 3. Section 3519 of the Government Code is amended to read:3519. It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.SEC. 4. Section 3543.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3543.5. It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. (c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).SEC. 5. Section 3571 of the Government Code is amended to read:3571. It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).(f)(g) Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.SEC. 6. Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code is amended to read:28858. It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.(b) Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.
3939
4040 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4141
4242 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4343
44-SECTION 1. Section 3558.9 is added to the Government Code, to read:3558.9. (a) (1) A public employer shall not question a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(2) Paragraph (1) is intended to be consistent with, and not in conflict with, William S. Hart Union High School District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2595.(b) A public employer shall not compel a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose to a third party, communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), this section does not apply to a criminal investigation and does not supersede Section 3303.
44+SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares the following:(a) It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this act, to establish an employee-union representative privilege in the context of California public employment.(b) As with the attorney-client privilege, there is a strong interest in encouraging an employee accused of wrongdoing to communicate fully and frankly with their union representative, in order to receive accurate advice about the disciplinary process. The expectation of confidentiality is critical to the employee-union representative privilege. Without confidentiality, union members would be hesitant to be fully forthcoming with their representatives, detrimentally impacting a union representatives ability to advise and represent union members with questions or problems.(c) This employee-labor organization representative privilege is intended to extend to communications made in confidence, in connection with representation relating to concerted activities, including, but not limited to, anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings, between an employee and their recognized labor organization representative, and where the representative is acting in their official representative capacity.(d) This privilege does not extend to criminal investigations, but does prohibit the employing agency from compelling any disclosures, including to third parties.(e) It is the intent of the legislature to supersede American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior Court, 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003).
4545
46-SECTION 1. Section 3558.9 is added to the Government Code, to read:
46+SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares the following:(a) It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this act, to establish an employee-union representative privilege in the context of California public employment.(b) As with the attorney-client privilege, there is a strong interest in encouraging an employee accused of wrongdoing to communicate fully and frankly with their union representative, in order to receive accurate advice about the disciplinary process. The expectation of confidentiality is critical to the employee-union representative privilege. Without confidentiality, union members would be hesitant to be fully forthcoming with their representatives, detrimentally impacting a union representatives ability to advise and represent union members with questions or problems.(c) This employee-labor organization representative privilege is intended to extend to communications made in confidence, in connection with representation relating to concerted activities, including, but not limited to, anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings, between an employee and their recognized labor organization representative, and where the representative is acting in their official representative capacity.(d) This privilege does not extend to criminal investigations, but does prohibit the employing agency from compelling any disclosures, including to third parties.(e) It is the intent of the legislature to supersede American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior Court, 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003).
47+
48+SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares the following:
4749
4850 ### SECTION 1.
4951
50-3558.9. (a) (1) A public employer shall not question a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(2) Paragraph (1) is intended to be consistent with, and not in conflict with, William S. Hart Union High School District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2595.(b) A public employer shall not compel a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose to a third party, communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), this section does not apply to a criminal investigation and does not supersede Section 3303.
52+(a) It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this act, to establish an employee-union representative privilege in the context of California public employment.
5153
52-3558.9. (a) (1) A public employer shall not question a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(2) Paragraph (1) is intended to be consistent with, and not in conflict with, William S. Hart Union High School District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2595.(b) A public employer shall not compel a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose to a third party, communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), this section does not apply to a criminal investigation and does not supersede Section 3303.
54+(b) As with the attorney-client privilege, there is a strong interest in encouraging an employee accused of wrongdoing to communicate fully and frankly with their union representative, in order to receive accurate advice about the disciplinary process. The expectation of confidentiality is critical to the employee-union representative privilege. Without confidentiality, union members would be hesitant to be fully forthcoming with their representatives, detrimentally impacting a union representatives ability to advise and represent union members with questions or problems.
5355
54-3558.9. (a) (1) A public employer shall not question a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(2) Paragraph (1) is intended to be consistent with, and not in conflict with, William S. Hart Union High School District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2595.(b) A public employer shall not compel a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose to a third party, communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), this section does not apply to a criminal investigation and does not supersede Section 3303.
56+(c) This employee-labor organization representative privilege is intended to extend to communications made in confidence, in connection with representation relating to concerted activities, including, but not limited to, anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings, between an employee and their recognized labor organization representative, and where the representative is acting in their official representative capacity.
57+
58+(d) This privilege does not extend to criminal investigations, but does prohibit the employing agency from compelling any disclosures, including to third parties.
59+
60+(e) It is the intent of the legislature to supersede American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior Court, 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003).
61+
62+SEC. 2. Section 3506.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3506.5. A public agency shall not do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.(b) Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.
63+
64+SEC. 2. Section 3506.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:
65+
66+### SEC. 2.
67+
68+3506.5. A public agency shall not do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.(b) Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.
69+
70+3506.5. A public agency shall not do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.(b) Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.
71+
72+3506.5. A public agency shall not do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.(b) Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.
5573
5674
5775
58-3558.9. (a) (1) A public employer shall not question a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative regarding communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
59-
60-(2) Paragraph (1) is intended to be consistent with, and not in conflict with, William S. Hart Union High School District (2018) PERB Dec. No. 2595.
61-
62-(b) A public employer shall not compel a public employee, a representative of a recognized employee organization, or an exclusive representative to disclose to a third party, communications made in confidence between a public employee and the representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
63-
64-(c) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) and (b), this section does not apply to a criminal investigation and does not supersede Section 3303.
65-
66-
67-
68-The Legislature finds and declares the following:
69-
70-
71-
72-(a)It is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting this act, to establish an employee-union representative privilege in the context of California public employment.
73-
74-
75-
76-(b)As with the attorney-client privilege, there is a strong interest in encouraging an employee accused of wrongdoing to communicate fully and frankly with their union representative, in order to receive accurate advice about the disciplinary process. The expectation of confidentiality is critical to the employee-union representative privilege. Without confidentiality, union members would be hesitant to be fully forthcoming with their representatives, detrimentally impacting a union representatives ability to advise and represent union members with questions or problems.
77-
78-
79-
80-(c)This employee-labor organization representative privilege is intended to extend to communications made in confidence, in connection with representation relating to concerted activities, including, but not limited to, anticipated or ongoing disciplinary proceedings, between an employee and their recognized labor organization representative, and where the representative is acting in their official representative capacity.
81-
82-
83-
84-(d)This privilege does not extend to criminal investigations, but does prohibit the employing agency from compelling any disclosures, including to third parties.
85-
86-
87-
88-(e)It is the intent of the legislature to supersede American Airlines, Inc. v. Superior Court, 114 Cal.App.4th 881 (2003).
89-
90-
91-
92-
93-
94-
95-
96-A public agency shall not do any of the following:
97-
98-
76+3506.5. A public agency shall not do any of the following:
9977
10078 (a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter.
10179
102-
103-
10480 (b) Deny to employee organizations the rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.
10581
82+(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
10683
107-
108-(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
84+(c)
10985
11086
11187
11288 (d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with a recognized employee organization. For purposes of this subdivision, knowingly providing a recognized employee organization with inaccurate information regarding the financial resources of the public employer, whether or not in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.
11389
90+(d)
91+
11492
11593
11694 (e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, contribute financial or other support to any employee organization, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.
95+
96+(e)
11797
11898
11999
120100 (f) Refuse to participate in good faith in an applicable impasse procedure.
121101
102+SEC. 3. Section 3519 of the Government Code is amended to read:3519. It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.
103+
104+SEC. 3. Section 3519 of the Government Code is amended to read:
105+
106+### SEC. 3.
107+
108+3519. It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.
109+
110+3519. It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.
111+
112+3519. It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.
122113
123114
124115
125-
126-
127-
128-It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:
129-
130-
116+3519. It shall be unlawful for the state to do any of the following:
131117
132118 (a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.
133119
134-
135-
136120 (b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.
137121
122+(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.
138123
139-
140-(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organization's representation.
124+(c)
141125
142126
143127
144128 (d) Refuse or fail to meet and confer in good faith with a recognized employee organization.
145129
130+(d)
131+
146132
147133
148134 (e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.
135+
136+(e)
149137
150138
151139
152140 (f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the mediation procedure set forth in Section 3518.
153141
142+SEC. 4. Section 3543.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:3543.5. It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. (c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).
143+
144+SEC. 4. Section 3543.5 of the Government Code is amended to read:
145+
146+### SEC. 4.
147+
148+3543.5. It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. (c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).
149+
150+3543.5. It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. (c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).
151+
152+3543.5. It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation. (c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).
154153
155154
156155
157-
158-
159-
160-It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:
161-
162-
156+3543.5. It is unlawful for a public school employer to do any of the following:
163157
164158 (a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.
165159
166-
167-
168160 (b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.
169161
162+(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
170163
171-
172-(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
164+(c)
173165
174166
175167
176168 (d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not in response to a request for information, regarding the financial resources of the public school employer constitutes a refusal or failure to meet and negotiate in good faith.
177169
170+(d)
171+
178172
179173
180174 (e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another.
175+
176+(e)
181177
182178
183179
184180 (f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3548).
185181
182+SEC. 5. Section 3571 of the Government Code is amended to read:3571. It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).(f)(g) Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.
183+
184+SEC. 5. Section 3571 of the Government Code is amended to read:
185+
186+### SEC. 5.
187+
188+3571. It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).(f)(g) Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.
189+
190+3571. It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).(f)(g) Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.
191+
192+3571. It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.(b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).(f)(g) Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.
186193
187194
188195
189-
190-
191-
192-It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:
193-
194-
196+3571. It shall be unlawful for the higher education employer to do any of the following:
195197
196198 (a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed by this chapter. For purposes of this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment.
197199
198-
199-
200200 (b) Deny to employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.
201201
202+(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
202203
203-
204-(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
204+(c)
205205
206206
207207
208208 (d) Refuse or fail to engage in meeting and conferring with an exclusive representative.
209209
210+(d)
211+
210212
211213
212214 (e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any organization in preference to another. However, subject to rules and regulations adopted by the board pursuant to Section 3563, an employer shall not be prohibited from permitting employees to engage in meeting and conferring or consulting during working hours without loss of pay or benefits.
215+
216+(e)
213217
214218
215219
216220 (f) Refuse to participate in good faith in the impasse procedure set forth in Article 9 (commencing with Section 3590).
217221
222+(f)
223+
218224
219225
220226 (g) Consult with any academic, professional, or staff advisory group on any matter within the scope of representation for employees who are represented by an exclusive representative, or for whom an employee organization has filed a request for recognition or certification as an exclusive representative until such time as the request is withdrawn or an election has been held in which no representative received a majority of the votes cast. This subdivision is not intended to diminish the prohibition of unfair practices contained in subdivision (d). For the purposes of this subdivision, the term academic shall not be deemed to include the academic senates.
221227
228+SEC. 6. Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code is amended to read:28858. It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.(b) Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.
229+
230+SEC. 6. Section 28858 of the Public Utilities Code is amended to read:
231+
232+### SEC. 6.
233+
234+28858. It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.(b) Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.
235+
236+28858. It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.(b) Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.
237+
238+28858. It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:(a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.(b) Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.(c)(d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.(d)(e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.(e)(f) Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.
222239
223240
224241
225-
226-
227-
228-It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:
229-
230-
242+28858. It is unlawful for the district to do any of the following:
231243
232244 (a) Impose or threaten to impose reprisals on employees, to discriminate or threaten to discriminate against employees, or otherwise to interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees because of their exercise of rights guaranteed to them by this chapter. As used in this subdivision, employee includes an applicant for employment or reemployment with the district.
233245
234-
235-
236246 (b) Deny employee organizations rights guaranteed to them by this chapter.
237247
248+(c) Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
238249
239-
240-(c)Question any employee or employee representative regarding communications made in confidence between an employee and an employee representative in connection with representation relating to any matter within the scope of the recognized employee organizations representation.
250+(c)
241251
242252
243253
244254 (d) Refuse or fail to meet and negotiate in good faith with an exclusive representative. Knowingly providing an exclusive representative with inaccurate information, whether or not it is in response to a request for information, constitutes a refusal or failure of the district to meet and negotiate in good faith with the exclusive representative.
245255
256+(d)
257+
246258
247259
248260 (e) Dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any employee organization, or contribute financial or other support to it, or in any way encourage employees to join any employee organization in preference to another.
261+
262+(e)
249263
250264
251265
252266 (f) Refuse to participate in good faith in mutually agreed upon impasse procedures.