California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB36

Introduced
12/2/24  
Refer
2/3/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/20/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Engrossed
5/8/25  
Refer
5/8/25  
Refer
5/21/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Refer
7/16/25  
Report Pass
8/18/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Enrolled
9/10/25  

Caption

Housing elements: prohousing designation.

Impact

The bill mandates that as of the seventh housing element cycle, upon request from small rural jurisdictions (defined as cities with populations under 25,000 or counties with populations under 200,000), HCD must evaluate their housing element submissions without imposing renewal requirements for at least four years. This provision is designed to alleviate administrative burdens on smaller jurisdictions and promote consistent compliance with statewide housing goals.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 36, introduced by Assembly Member Soria, aims to amend Section 65589.9 of the Government Code regarding housing elements and prohousing designations. This bill seeks to transition the process of designating jurisdictions as prohousing from emergency regulations to permanent regulations established by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). This shift is intended to create a more stable and lasting framework for jurisdictions to qualify for such a designation based on their housing elements, particularly focusing on compliance with state regulations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 36 appears to be supportive among legislators and stakeholders advocating for housing accessibility and compliance. Supporters argue that this bill aligns with broader efforts to address housing shortages and encourages local governments to adopt prohousing strategies. There may be concerns, however, regarding the adequacy of resources and support needed for smaller jurisdictions to meet the compliance criteria effectively.

Contention

A notable point of contention may involve the bill's framework for prompting local jurisdictions to implement prohousing local policies. Critics might voice concerns over the influencer's potential rigidity in assessing compliance and the associated risks of favoring urban and suburban areas over rural towns in housing policy discussions. The bill's requirement for jurisdictions to maintain compliant housing elements could also spark debate about the feasibility of local governments meeting state expectations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2793

Housing elements: prohousing incentives.

CA SB341

Housing development.

CA AB529

Adaptive reuse projects.

CA AB129

Housing.

CA SB129

Housing.

CA AB1764

Housing omnibus.

CA SB1037

Planning and zoning: housing element: enforcement.

CA AB1886

Housing Element Law: substantial compliance: Housing Accountability Act.

CA AB3201

Planning and Zoning Law: housing elements.

CA AB2910

State Housing Law: City of Los Angeles: conversion of nonresidential buildings.

Similar Bills

CA SB262

Housing element: prohousing designations: prohousing local policies.

CA AB2793

Housing elements: prohousing incentives.

CA AB529

Adaptive reuse projects.

CA AB1029

Housing elements: prohousing local policies.

CA AB1398

Planning and zoning: housing element: rezoning of sites: prohousing local policies.

CA SB341

Housing development.