California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB374

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/19/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/10/25  

Caption

K–14 classified employees: payment of wages: itemized statements.

Impact

If enacted, AB 374 will amend the Education Code to require public school employers and community colleges to maintain proper records of deductions for a minimum of three years. This requirement provides employees with the right to access their employment records easily, thereby fostering better communication and trust between employers and classified staff. By establishing uniform standards for wage statements, the bill targets improving compliance and the quality of information available to employees regarding their compensation.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 374, introduced by Assembly Member Nguyen, aims to enhance the rights of classified employees within California's public school systems and community colleges by mandating that employers provide itemized wage statements during each pay period. The proposed legislation requires public school employers to furnish employees with an accurate itemized statement that includes gross wages earned, deductions, hourly rates, and days worked. This legislative measure intends to bring clarity and transparency to payroll practices in public education, ensuring that employee rights are upheld in line with standards afforded to private sector workers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 374 appears to be favorable as it aligns with the interests of supporting worker rights and transparency in employment practices. Many stakeholders view the bill as a necessary step to ensure that classified employees are informed about their earnings and deductions, thus promoting fairness in compensation. Additionally, this initiative reflects a broader trend toward enhancing employee rights and benefits in the education sector, garnering support from public labor unions and advocacy groups.

Contention

However, some potential points of contention might arise regarding implementation costs and administrative burdens for educational institutions. Critics may argue that the documentation requirements could impose additional strains on school budgets, especially for smaller districts with limited resources. Nevertheless, proponents counter that the long-term benefits of increased employee satisfaction and better compliance will outweigh these concerns.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB494

Classified school and community college employees: disciplinary hearings: appeals: contracted administrative law judges.

CA AB917

County offices of education: school districts: average daily attendance of less than 250 pupils: permanent status.

CA AB1247

Classified employees: school districts and community college districts: contracting out: training requirements.

CA AB1028

Community colleges: part-time faculty.

AZ HB2389

Business personal property; exemption.

CA SB605

State attorneys and administrative law judges: compensation.

CA AB378

Education finance: Classified School Employee Summer Assistance Program.

OR SB851

Relating to administration of Public Employees Retirement System member account data.