California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB382

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
2/24/25  
Refer
2/25/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  
Refer
4/8/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  

Caption

Pedestrian safety: school zones: speed limits.

Impact

The anticipated impact of AB 382 on state laws involves creating a state-mandated local program that would necessitate updates to the speed limit signage in school zones. The bill also permits local authorities to set a lower speed limit of 15 miles per hour in residential districts adjacent to schools. This modification is expected to increase safety for children around schools, particularly during peak drop-off and pick-up times.

Summary

Assembly Bill 382, introduced by Assembly Member Berman, aims to enhance pedestrian safety in school zones by modifying existing speed limit regulations. Under current law, the prima facie speed limit when approaching or passing a school is set at 25 miles per hour. The bill proposes to temporarily allow local authorities to set a prima facie speed limit of 20 miles per hour in school zones until January 1, 2029. After this date, the 20 mph limit would become standard, contingent on specific conditions being met, such as the visibility of children and signage indicating reduced speed limits.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 382 appears favorable among proponents who emphasize the need for improved safety measures for children. Advocates argue that reducing speed limits in school zones could significantly decrease the risk of accidents involving pedestrians. However, there may be contention from local authorities who might have concerns about the costs associated with changing signage and the implications of state mandates on local decision-making.

Contention

A key point of contention could arise regarding the enforcement and practicality of the new speed limits set by local authorities and the state's role in overseeing these modifications. While the bill provides clear regulatory changes, local governments may debate the costs associated with implementing new signage and conducting necessary traffic surveys. Additionally, the requirement for reimbursement from the state may lead to discussions about the adequacy of funding for local agencies to meet these new mandates.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB601

Child abuse: reporting.

CA SB720

Automated traffic enforcement system programs.

MN SF2094

Various requirements governing active transportation modification

MN HF1804

Active transportation various governing requirements modified, electric-assisted bicycle rebate eligibility and amount modified, and rulemaking authorized.

CA SB71

California Environmental Quality Act: exemptions: transit projects.

OH HB203

Enact Aspen Runnels' Law

OH HB54

Make appropriations for transportation for FY 2026-27 biennium

ND HB1421

Farm tractors, speed limitations, and minimum speed limits; and to provide a penalty.