California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB394

Introduced
2/3/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/2/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Refer
7/17/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/12/25  

Caption

Public transportation providers.

Impact

The proposed legislation modifies the penalties associated with battery offenses against transportation personnel, allowing for stricter enforcement against offenders who assault these individuals. The bill ensures that such crimes are treated with higher seriousness, whereby the penalties may include fines of up to $10,000 or imprisonment for up to three years if the victim sustains injuries. By broadening the scope of who is protected under battery laws, the bill instigates important changes to state statutes, thereby enhancing the legal framework around public transport safety.

Summary

Assembly Bill 394, introduced by Assembly Member Wilson, amends existing law regarding public transportation providers, specifically in the context of battery offenses committed against employees and contractors of transportation services. The bill expands the definition of unlawful battery to protect not only passengers and operators but also employees working within public transportation systems. This initiative arises from a recognition of the increasing threats and instances of violence faced by those working in this field, and it aims to enhance their safety and security while performing their duties.

Sentiment

General sentiment around AB 394 appears to be supportive among lawmakers as a necessary reform to protect public transportation workers. As discussions unfold, proponents indicate that it is crucial for legislative bodies to acknowledge and react to the growing issues of violence in public transit systems, aiming to effectively deter potential offenders. Notably, this aligns with broader initiatives to secure safety across various public service sectors.

Contention

Despite a largely favorable reception, there may be points of contention regarding the implications of additional legal burdens placed on system operators and enforcement agencies. Critics may voice concerns about the adequacy of resources available to enforce these new laws and the potential for misapplication of the statutes affecting civil liberties. Moreover, discussions on how this bill intertwines with existing protections for workers and its overall effectiveness in reducing violence in public transit environments remain areas of debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2824

Battery: public transportation provider.

CA SB428

Temporary restraining orders and protective orders: employee harassment.

CA SB553

Occupational safety: workplace violence: restraining orders and workplace violence prevention plan.

CA AB36

Domestic violence protective orders: possession of a firearm.

CA AB3278

Transportation: omnibus bill.

CA SB2

Firearms.

CA AB819

Crimes: public transportation: fare evasion.

CA AB2907

Firearms: restrained persons.

CA AB1906

California Law Revision Commission: persons with disabilities: terminology.

CA SB596

School employees: protection.

Similar Bills

CA SB428

Temporary restraining orders and protective orders: employee harassment.

CA SB553

Occupational safety: workplace violence: restraining orders and workplace violence prevention plan.

CA AB824

Protective orders: firearms and ammunition.

CA AB611

Safe at Home program: homeowners’ associations.

CA AB1692

Judiciary omnibus.