California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB446

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Report Pass
5/6/25  
Engrossed
5/12/25  
Refer
5/13/25  

Caption

Surveillance pricing.

Impact

If enacted, AB 446 would prohibit any entity from engaging in surveillance pricing unless certain conditions are met. Specifically, it defines surveillance pricing as the practice of adjusting prices based on covered information acquired through surveillance methods. Exceptions are made for price differences that result from cost-based pricing, uniform discounts available to all consumers, and specific promotional efforts. The bill also stipulates civil penalties for violations, establishing a legal framework that empowers consumers and enhances their privacy rights.

Summary

Assembly Bill 446, introduced by Assembly Member Ward, aims to address the emerging issue of 'surveillance pricing' in California. This legislation seeks to prohibit businesses from utilizing information gathered through surveillance technologies to set individualized prices for goods and services. In doing so, AB446 aligns its objectives with the existing frameworks of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), reinforcing consumer rights regarding personal data usage.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 446 is largely supportive among consumer rights advocates and privacy organizations, who argue that such legislation is essential in protecting consumers from exploitative pricing strategies based on sensitive personal data. Conversely, some business interests have expressed concern over potential operational burdens and the impacts on pricing strategies, arguing that the limitations imposed by the bill could hinder market competitiveness.

Contention

Debate regarding AB 446 focuses primarily on the balance between consumer protection and business adaptability. Proponents argue that the bill is crucial for safeguarding against discrimination in pricing practices enabled by data-driven technologies. On the other hand, critics emphasize the need for flexible strategies to allow businesses to adapt to market conditions and consumer demands. Ultimately, the discussion reveals significant tensions between consumer privacy rights and the commercial interests of businesses relying on innovative pricing models.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2765

Public Utilities Public Purpose Programs Fund.

CA AB982

Public Utilities Public Purpose Programs Fund.

CA AB2316

Public Utilities Commission: customer renewable energy subscription programs and the community renewable energy program.

CA AB1139

Net energy metering.

CA AB781

Charges: health savings accounts: electricity.

CA SB778

Buy Clean California Act: Environmental Product Declarations: concrete.

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

CA SB1221

Gas corporations: ceasing service: priority neighborhood decarbonization zones.