California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB461

Introduced
2/6/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Refer
5/21/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/1/25  
Refer
7/1/25  
Report Pass
7/15/25  
Refer
7/15/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/10/25  

Caption

Truancy.

Impact

By repealing this section, AB 461 removes the criminal penalties associated with parental supervision of school attendance. This legislative change is intended to shift the approach from punishment to support, fostering an environment where families can receive help without the threat of legal action. The bill aligns with broader educational reforms aimed at addressing truancy through supportive measures rather than punitive ones, thereby potentially influencing other education-related laws and policies.

Summary

Assembly Bill 461, titled the More Help Not Less Act of 2025, seeks to repeal Section 270.1 of the Penal Code, which currently makes parents or guardians of chronic truants guilty of a misdemeanor. This law imposes penalties, including fines and potential jail time, on parents who are deemed to have failed in encouraging their child’s school attendance despite receiving support services for truancy issues. The primary aim of AB 461 is to alleviate the punitive measures against parents while promoting support for families to improve student attendance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 461 appears to be largely positive, particularly among advocates for educational reform and child welfare. Supporters argue that the bill represents a necessary shift in how truancy is addressed, moving from a punitive approach to one that recognizes the challenges faced by families. However, concerns have been raised that without some accountability for parents, the bill may not sufficiently address the root causes of truancy, leading to ongoing educational challenges for children.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding AB 461 include discussions about the balance between parental accountability and providing adequate support for families. Critics of the repeal worry that eliminating legal consequences might reduce incentives for parents to ensure their children's attendance, while proponents insist that addressing the issues related to truancy through supportive services would lead to better long-term outcomes for students. The debate emphasizes the need for comprehensive strategies that incorporate both support mechanisms and parental involvement.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB691

Pupil attendance: truancy notifications.

CA SCR36

Arts Education Month.

CA AB51

Early childcare and education: California state preschool program.

CA AB2226

Elementary education: kindergarten.

CA SB1056

Elementary education: kindergarten.

CA SB321

Literacy: libraries: Local Public Library Partnership Program.

CA ACR17

California Native American Day and the California Indian Cultural Awareness Conference.

CA AB384

School facilities: recommended interior temperatures: inventory of heating and cooling systems.

CA ACR94

Juneteenth.

CA SB274

Suspensions and expulsions: willful defiance: interventions and supports.

Similar Bills

LA SB121

Provides relative to terminology of court-ordered and other mandatory examinations in civil and administrative matters and claims. (gov sig) (EGF NO IMPACT See Note)

MS HB652

Excused absence; permit for students participating in roping or barrel horse racing events.

MS HB1048

Compulsory school age; revise definition to include children who attain the age of five years before September 1.

MS HB1358

Excused absences; permit for students participating in roping or barrel horse events.

MS HB1318

Excused absence; permit for students participating in roping or barrel horse events.

MS HB887

Compulsory school age; revise definition to include children who attain the age of five years before September 1.

MS SB2824

Elections; allow an excused absence for compulsory-school-age children to serve as poll workers on election day.

MS HB343

Compulsory-school-age child; revise definition of by increasing required age to 18 years.