California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB489

Introduced
2/10/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
4/21/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Refer
5/7/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
6/16/25  
Refer
6/16/25  
Report Pass
6/23/25  
Refer
6/23/25  
Report Pass
7/8/25  
Refer
7/8/25  
Report Pass
7/16/25  
Refer
7/16/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/8/25  
Enrolled
9/8/25  
Chaptered
10/11/25  

Caption

Health care professions: deceptive terms or letters: artificial intelligence.

Impact

AB 489 expands existing laws surrounding the regulation of healthcare professions by introducing specific provisions that hold entities deploying AI accountable for any misleading statements regarding qualifications. The enforcement of these provisions falls under the jurisdiction of relevant healthcare licensing boards. Each infringement is treated as an individual violation, potentially leading to multiple sanctions against an entity depending on the frequency of the violation. The bill aims to promote ethical standards and transparency in healthcare technology.

Summary

Assembly Bill 489, introduced by Assemblymember Bonta, addresses the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and healthcare professions by prohibiting the use of certain terms that could imply that AI-generated advice or care is provided by licensed professionals. The bill establishes that it is illegal for any AI or generative AI technology to use phrases that suggest it is operated by a licensed health care practitioner when it is not. This measure aims to protect patients from potential deception while using AI-based health services.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 489 seems generally positive regarding patient protections; however, the introduction of additional regulations on AI technology has raised concerns among some technology developers. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary to ensure that patients are informed about who is providing their healthcare advice and to prevent deceptive practices. Critics, particularly from the tech sector, may view this as an overreach that could stifle innovation and create burdensome barriers for AI applications in healthcare.

Contention

While there is broad agreement on the need for patient protection in the context of AI, the bill raises contentious points about the balance between regulation and innovation. Opponents fear that heavy-handed regulations could discourage the development of beneficial AI technologies in healthcare. The discussions around AB 489 highlight a significant discourse on how to incorporate rapidly evolving technologies into existing regulatory frameworks without compromising safety and trust in the healthcare system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB903

Mental health professionals: artificial intelligence.

CA HB1720

Artificial intelligence; prohibit use in provision of professional mental and behaioral health care.

CA AB1979

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

CA AB2575

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

CA HB1048

Artifical intelligence; prohibit use of in professional mental and behavioral health care.

CA HB1139

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care

CA A799

Prohibits advertising artificial intelligence system as licensed mental health professional.

CA S735

Prohibits advertising artificial intelligence system as licensed mental health professional.

CA SB2037

Artificial intelligence; requiring informed consent for use by licensed mental health professional or health care provider; authorizing and prohibiting certain uses. Emergency.

CA HB1620

Disclosure of artificial intelligence use in health care.

Similar Bills

HI HB1887

Relating To Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education.

HI SB2212

Relating To Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education.

CA SB813

California AI Standards and Safety Commission: independent verification organizations.

HI SB2923

Relating To Artificial Intelligence.

CA AB1137

Reporting mechanism: child sexual abuse material.

NJ A2616

Requires OIT to develop NJ generative artificial intelligence program and implement artificial intelligence education courses with county governments; appropriates $1.5 million.

CA SB420

An act to add Chapter 24.

NJ A4352

Requires school districts to provide instruction on artificial intelligence; requires Secretary of Higher Education to develop artificial intelligence model curricula.