California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB510 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Amended IN Assembly April 10, 2025 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 510Introduced by Assembly Member AddisFebruary 10, 2025 An act to amend Section 1368.01 of, and to add Section 1367.017 to, the Health and Safety Code, to amend Section 10123.137 of, and to add Section 10123.138 to, the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 510, as amended, Addis. Health care coverage: utilization review: appeals and grievances. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or disability insurer to include in a response regarding decisions to deny, delay, or modify health care services, among other things, information on how the provider, enrollee, or insured may file a grievance or appeal with the plan or insurer. Existing law requires a health care service plans grievance system to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as specified. Existing law requires a contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions requiring a dispute resolution mechanism, and requires an insurer to resolve each provider dispute within 45 working days, as specified. This bill would, upon request, require that an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan or disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, be reviewed by a licensed physician physician, or a licensed health care professional under specified circumstances, who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill would authorize review of a grievance or appeal by a licensed health care professional if the provider requesting review is not a physician. The bill, notwithstanding the above-described timelines, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees or insureds condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or disability health insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the prior authorization request for the health care service as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1367.017 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional. (e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.SEC. 2. Section 1368.01 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.SEC. 3. Section 10123.137 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.SEC. 4. Section 10123.138 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability health insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability health insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability health insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability health insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability health insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional.(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
1+CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 510Introduced by Assembly Member AddisFebruary 10, 2025 An act to amend Section 1368.01 of, and to add Section 1367.017 to, the Health and Safety Code, to amend Section 10123.137 of, and to add Section 10123.138 to, the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 510, as introduced, Addis. Health care coverage: utilization review: appeals and grievances. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or disability insurer to include in a response regarding decisions to deny, delay, or modify health care services, among other things, information on how the provider, enrollee, or insured may file a grievance or appeal with the plan or insurer. Existing law requires a health care service plans grievance system to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as specified. Existing law requires a contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions requiring a dispute resolution mechanism, and requires an insurer to resolve each provider dispute within 45 working days, as specified. This bill would, upon request, require that an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan or disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill, notwithstanding the above-described timelines, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees or insureds condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or disability insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the prior authorization request as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1367.017 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. SEC. 2. Section 1368.01 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c). (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.SEC. 3. Section 10123.137 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute. dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.SEC. 4. Section 10123.138 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135 , a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
22
3- Amended IN Assembly April 10, 2025 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 510Introduced by Assembly Member AddisFebruary 10, 2025 An act to amend Section 1368.01 of, and to add Section 1367.017 to, the Health and Safety Code, to amend Section 10123.137 of, and to add Section 10123.138 to, the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 510, as amended, Addis. Health care coverage: utilization review: appeals and grievances. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or disability insurer to include in a response regarding decisions to deny, delay, or modify health care services, among other things, information on how the provider, enrollee, or insured may file a grievance or appeal with the plan or insurer. Existing law requires a health care service plans grievance system to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as specified. Existing law requires a contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions requiring a dispute resolution mechanism, and requires an insurer to resolve each provider dispute within 45 working days, as specified. This bill would, upon request, require that an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan or disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, be reviewed by a licensed physician physician, or a licensed health care professional under specified circumstances, who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill would authorize review of a grievance or appeal by a licensed health care professional if the provider requesting review is not a physician. The bill, notwithstanding the above-described timelines, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees or insureds condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or disability health insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the prior authorization request for the health care service as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
3+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 510Introduced by Assembly Member AddisFebruary 10, 2025 An act to amend Section 1368.01 of, and to add Section 1367.017 to, the Health and Safety Code, to amend Section 10123.137 of, and to add Section 10123.138 to, the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 510, as introduced, Addis. Health care coverage: utilization review: appeals and grievances. Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or disability insurer to include in a response regarding decisions to deny, delay, or modify health care services, among other things, information on how the provider, enrollee, or insured may file a grievance or appeal with the plan or insurer. Existing law requires a health care service plans grievance system to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as specified. Existing law requires a contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions requiring a dispute resolution mechanism, and requires an insurer to resolve each provider dispute within 45 working days, as specified. This bill would, upon request, require that an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan or disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill, notwithstanding the above-described timelines, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees or insureds condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or disability insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the prior authorization request as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: YES Local Program: YES
44
5- Amended IN Assembly April 10, 2025
65
7-Amended IN Assembly April 10, 2025
6+
7+
88
99 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20252026 REGULAR SESSION
1010
1111 Assembly Bill
1212
1313 No. 510
1414
1515 Introduced by Assembly Member AddisFebruary 10, 2025
1616
1717 Introduced by Assembly Member Addis
1818 February 10, 2025
1919
2020 An act to amend Section 1368.01 of, and to add Section 1367.017 to, the Health and Safety Code, to amend Section 10123.137 of, and to add Section 10123.138 to, the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.
2121
2222 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2323
2424 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2525
26-AB 510, as amended, Addis. Health care coverage: utilization review: appeals and grievances.
26+AB 510, as introduced, Addis. Health care coverage: utilization review: appeals and grievances.
2727
28-Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or disability insurer to include in a response regarding decisions to deny, delay, or modify health care services, among other things, information on how the provider, enrollee, or insured may file a grievance or appeal with the plan or insurer. Existing law requires a health care service plans grievance system to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as specified. Existing law requires a contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions requiring a dispute resolution mechanism, and requires an insurer to resolve each provider dispute within 45 working days, as specified. This bill would, upon request, require that an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan or disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, be reviewed by a licensed physician physician, or a licensed health care professional under specified circumstances, who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill would authorize review of a grievance or appeal by a licensed health care professional if the provider requesting review is not a physician. The bill, notwithstanding the above-described timelines, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees or insureds condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or disability health insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the prior authorization request for the health care service as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
28+Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or disability insurer to include in a response regarding decisions to deny, delay, or modify health care services, among other things, information on how the provider, enrollee, or insured may file a grievance or appeal with the plan or insurer. Existing law requires a health care service plans grievance system to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as specified. Existing law requires a contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions requiring a dispute resolution mechanism, and requires an insurer to resolve each provider dispute within 45 working days, as specified. This bill would, upon request, require that an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan or disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill, notwithstanding the above-described timelines, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees or insureds condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or disability insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the prior authorization request as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions. Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
2929
3030 Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. Existing law requires a health care service plan or disability insurer to include in a response regarding decisions to deny, delay, or modify health care services, among other things, information on how the provider, enrollee, or insured may file a grievance or appeal with the plan or insurer. Existing law requires a health care service plans grievance system to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as specified. Existing law requires a contract between a health insurer and a provider to contain provisions requiring a dispute resolution mechanism, and requires an insurer to resolve each provider dispute within 45 working days, as specified.
3131
32-This bill would, upon request, require that an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan or disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, be reviewed by a licensed physician physician, or a licensed health care professional under specified circumstances, who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill would authorize review of a grievance or appeal by a licensed health care professional if the provider requesting review is not a physician. The bill, notwithstanding the above-described timelines, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees or insureds condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or disability health insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the prior authorization request for the health care service as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions.
32+This bill would, upon request, require that an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan or disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill, notwithstanding the above-described timelines, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees or insureds condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or disability insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the prior authorization request as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions.
3333
3434 Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
3535
3636 The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
3737
3838 This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
3939
4040 ## Digest Key
4141
4242 ## Bill Text
4343
44-The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1367.017 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional. (e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.SEC. 2. Section 1368.01 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.SEC. 3. Section 10123.137 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.SEC. 4. Section 10123.138 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability health insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability health insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability health insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability health insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability health insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional.(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
44+The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 1367.017 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. SEC. 2. Section 1368.01 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c). (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.SEC. 3. Section 10123.137 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute. dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.SEC. 4. Section 10123.138 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135 , a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
4545
4646 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4747
4848 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
4949
50-SECTION 1. Section 1367.017 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional. (e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
50+SECTION 1. Section 1367.017 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
5151
5252 SECTION 1. Section 1367.017 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:
5353
5454 ### SECTION 1.
5555
56-1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional. (e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
56+1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
5757
58-1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional. (e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
58+1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
5959
60-1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional. (e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
60+1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements: (1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. (c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
6161
6262
6363
64-1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:
64+1367.017. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:
6565
66-(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan.
66+(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan.
6767
6868 (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollees condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.
6969
70-(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.
70+(b) If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.
7171
72-(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.
72+(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a health care service plans contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
7373
74-(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional.
75-
76-(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
77-
78-(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
79-
80-(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
81-
82-SEC. 2. Section 1368.01 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
74+SEC. 2. Section 1368.01 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c). (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
8375
8476 SEC. 2. Section 1368.01 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:
8577
8678 ### SEC. 2.
8779
88-1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
80+1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c). (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
8981
90-1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
82+1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c). (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
9183
92-1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
84+1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c). (c) and Section 1367.017.(b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.(c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
9385
9486
9587
96-1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c) and Section 1367.017.
88+1368.01. (a) The grievance system shall require the plan to resolve grievances within 30 days, except as provided in subdivision (c). (c) and Section 1367.017.
9789
9890 (b) The grievance system shall include a requirement for expedited plan review of grievances for cases involving an imminent and serious threat to the health of the patient, including, but not limited to, severe pain, potential loss of life, limb, or major bodily function. When the plan has notice of a case requiring expedited review, the grievance system shall require the plan to immediately inform enrollees and subscribers in writing of their right to notify the department of the grievance. The grievance system shall also require the plan to provide enrollees, subscribers, and the department with a written statement on the disposition or pending status of the grievance no later than three days from receipt of the grievance, except as provided in subdivision (c). Paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 1368 shall not apply to grievances handled pursuant to this section.
9991
10092 (c) A health care service plan contract in the individual, small group, or large group markets that provides coverage for outpatient prescription drugs shall comply with subdivision (c) of Section 156.122 of Title 45 of the Code of Federal Regulations. This subdivision shall not apply to Medi-Cal managed care health care service plan contracts or any entity that enters into a contract with the State Department of Health Care Services pursuant to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000), Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 14200), or Chapter 8.75 (commencing with Section 14591) of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
10193
102-SEC. 3. Section 10123.137 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
94+SEC. 3. Section 10123.137 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute. dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
10395
10496 SEC. 3. Section 10123.137 of the Insurance Code is amended to read:
10597
10698 ### SEC. 3.
10799
108-10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
100+10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute. dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
109101
110-10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
102+10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute. dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
111103
112-10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
104+10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.(b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute. dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.(d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.(e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
113105
114106
115107
116108 10123.137. (a) Each contract between a health insurer and a provider shall contain provisions requiring a fast, fair, and cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism under which providers may submit disputes to the insurer, and requiring the insurer to inform its providers, upon contracting with the insurer, or upon change to these provisions, of the procedures for processing and resolving disputes, including the location and telephone number where information regarding disputes may be submitted.
117109
118110 (b) An insurer shall also ensure that a dispute resolution mechanism is accessible to noncontracting providers for the purpose of resolving billing and claims disputes.
119111
120-(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.
112+(c) Disputes are to be submitted to the insurer in writing and shall include provider name, provider tax identification number, patient name, insurers identification information, dates of service, description of dispute, and, if applicable, billed and paid amounts. The insurer shall resolve each provider dispute consistent with applicable law and issue a written determination within 45 working days after the date of receipt of the provider dispute. dispute, except as provided in Section 10123.138.
121113
122114 (d) On and after July 1, 2007, an insurer shall annually submit a report to the department regarding its dispute resolution mechanism. The report shall be public information and include, at a minimum, information on the number of providers that utilized the dispute resolution mechanism and a summary of the disposition of those disputes. To the extent the commissioner requires detailed information disclosing emerging or established patterns of provider disputes or corrective action by the insurer, the commissioner may maintain the confidentiality of any information found to be proprietary, upon written request of the insurer. In no event shall the commissioner find the required minimum information described in this subdivision to be proprietary.
123115
124116 (e) If an insurer has an affiliated or subsidiary company that is licensed as a health care service plan under Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 1340) of Division 2 of the Health and Safety Code, the insurer may use the same procedures relating to the provider dispute resolution process established by the affiliated or subsidiary entity pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1367 of the Health and Safety Code.
125117
126-SEC. 4. Section 10123.138 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability health insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability health insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability health insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability health insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability health insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional.(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
118+SEC. 4. Section 10123.138 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135 , a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
127119
128120 SEC. 4. Section 10123.138 is added to the Insurance Code, to read:
129121
130122 ### SEC. 4.
131123
132-10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability health insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability health insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability health insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability health insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability health insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional.(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
124+10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135 , a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
133125
134-10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability health insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability health insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability health insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability health insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability health insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional.(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
126+10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135 , a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
135127
136-10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability health insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability health insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability health insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability health insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability health insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional.(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
128+10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability insurer.(2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135 , a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.(b) If a disability insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
137129
138130
139131
140-10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:
132+10123.138. (a) Upon request, an appeal or grievance regarding a decision by a disability insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, shall be reviewed by a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The review process shall meet both of the following requirements:
141133
142-(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability health insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability health insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability health insurer.
134+(1) Upon a request for review pursuant to this section, a disability insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician, without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional disability insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the disability insurer.
143135
144136 (2) Notwithstanding any other law, a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135 , a review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insureds condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.
145137
146-(b) If a disability health insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.
138+(b) If a disability insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the prior authorization request shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.
147139
148-(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability health insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.
149-
150-(d) If a provider requesting review pursuant to this section is not a physician, the appeal or grievance may be reviewed by a peer health care professional.
151-
152-(e) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
153-
154-(1) Peer health care professional means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
155-
156-(2) Peer physician means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
140+(c) An appeal or grievance review may be performed by a disability insurers contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
157141
158142 SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
159143
160144 SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
161145
162146 SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution.
163147
164148 ### SEC. 5.