California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB56

Introduced
12/2/24  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
2/25/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Refer
5/29/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/3/25  
Report Pass
7/10/25  
Refer
7/10/25  
Report Pass
7/17/25  
Refer
7/17/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/12/25  

Caption

Social media: warning labels.

Impact

The law is expected to significantly impact state regulations regarding the operation of social media platforms. By 2027, platforms will be required to incorporate warning labels, aiming to educate users, especially minors and their parents, about the potential dangers of prolonged engagement with these platforms. The initiative is aligned with broader public health efforts to combat rising mental health concerns among young people, demonstrating a proactive approach to managing digital consumption among minors.

Summary

Assembly Bill 56, known as the Social Media Warning Law, aims to improve user awareness of the mental health risks associated with social media usage, particularly for minors. This legislation mandates that social media platforms display a prominent warning to users when they initially access the platform and again after periods of extended usage. The warning must inform users about the potential mental health harms linked to social media interactions, as highlighted by findings from the Surgeon General regarding the effects of excessive usage on youth mental health.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 56 is largely supportive among mental health advocates and parents who seek better protections for youth in the digital space. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the practicality of implementing such regulations and whether they may inadvertently create an environment of mistrust or over-caution among younger users. Proponents believe the awareness raised by the warning labels can lead to better parental oversight and informed decisions about screen time.

Contention

Critics of the bill argue that while raising awareness is important, it may not address the root causes of addiction and mental health issues among youth. Some suggest that mandating warnings might simply serve as a superficial fix, while the deeper issues of platform design, which often prioritizes engagement over user well-being, remain unaddressed. Furthermore, the bill explicitly states that it does not create a private right of action, limiting legal recourse for users who might feel harmed by platforms, which has raised questions about accountability in the tech industry.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB976

Protecting Our Kids from Social Media Addiction Act.

CA AB2657

Social Media Commission.

CA ACR219

California Social Media Users’ Bill of Rights.

CA AB2481

Social media-related threats: reporting.

CA AB3172

Social media platforms: injuries to children: civil penalties.

CA AB1282

Mental health: impacts of social media.

CA AB3211

California Digital Content Provenance Standards.

CA SB60

Social media platforms: controlled substances: order to remove.

CA AB1027

Social media platforms: drug safety policies.

CA AB2390

Social Media Harm Reduction Pilot Program.

Similar Bills

CA AB2408

Social media platform: child users: addiction.

CA AB1137

Reporting mechanism: child sexual abuse material.

CA AB1545

Children: internet safety: platform operators.

CA AB3339

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act.

CA AB886

California Journalism Preservation Act.

CA SB1056

Violent posts.

CA SB287

Features that harm child users: civil penalty.

CA AB1394

Commercial sexual exploitation: child sexual abuse material: civil actions.