California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB57

Introduced
12/2/24  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
2/24/25  
Refer
2/25/25  
Report Pass
3/3/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Refer
5/7/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  

Caption

California Dream for All Program: descendants of formerly enslaved people.

Impact

The bill modifies existing laws governing the California Housing Finance Agency, which oversees housing finance and affordable housing initiatives. By reserving a portion of funds specifically for descendants of formerly enslaved people, the measure aims to directly combat inequalities in homeownership rates and provide financial support to low and moderate-income families. It reflects an acknowledgment of past injustices and seeks to create pathways for economic empowerment through homeownership for affected communities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 57, introduced by Assembly Member McKinnor, seeks to amend the Health and Safety Code to enhance the California Dream for All Program, specifically targeting descendants of formerly enslaved individuals. The bill mandates that a minimum of 10% of the California Dream for All Fund be allocated to descendants who qualify for home purchase assistance. This is aimed at addressing historical injustices and expanding access to homeownership among individuals who may face systemic economic barriers.

Sentiment

Discussions around AB 57 reveal a generally positive sentiment toward its goals, particularly among advocates for racial equity and economic justice. Supporters argue that the bill reflects a progressive step toward acknowledging and rectifying historical wrongs. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation and funding logistics, ensuring the program's sustainability without overextending state financial commitments.

Contention

While the bill is predominantly supported, there may be contention regarding how to define 'descendants of formerly enslaved people' and the criteria for eligibility to access the funds. Additionally, debates might arise over the 10% allocation, as some advocates might argue for a higher percentage to achieve more significant impact, while fiscal conservatives might express concerns about the financial implications of such mandates. The bill represents a critical intersection of housing policy and social justice that may lead to further discussions in the legislative process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1668

California Conservation Corps: Education and Employment Reentry Program.

CA SB1458

Homeless Coordinating and Financing Council.

CA AB1316

Public health: childhood lead poisoning: prevention.

CA SB648

Care facilities.

CA SB1013

Taxation: Property Tax Assistance for Descendants of Enslaved Persons.

CA AB164

Food assistance.

CA SB704

Telecommunications: Moore Universal Telephone Service Act.

CA AB180

Institutional and community corrections: Smart Justice Student Program.