California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB596

Introduced
2/13/25  
Refer
2/24/25  
Report Pass
3/10/25  
Refer
3/11/25  
Report Pass
3/19/25  

Caption

Occupational safety: face coverings.

Impact

If enacted, AB 596 would have a significant impact on California's Labor Code by formally recognizing the right of workers to wear face coverings in all employment settings. This legislation aligns with the state's commitment to ensuring worker safety and public health—particularly vital in response to health threats like pandemics. The proposed bill applies to various work environments, including those with minimal or no direct contact among employees, thereby broadening its applicability.

Summary

Assembly Bill 596, introduced by Assembly Member McKinnor, focuses on occupational safety by codifying existing regulations related to face coverings in the workplace. The bill stipulates that employers are prohibited from preventing employees from wearing face coverings, which can include types of masks and respirators, unless it creates a safety hazard. This legislative move aims to enhance health and safety measures in workplaces, particularly in light of ongoing public health concerns.

Sentiment

The support for AB 596 is primarily anchored in the desire to uphold worker safety and respond effectively to health risks. Advocates argue that the legislation will provide necessary protections for employees, especially in sectors where the risk of infection is heightened. Critics, however, may view the move as an infringement on employer freedom to manage health protocols in their organizations. Overall, the sentiment surrounding the bill appears supportive among public health officials and employee advocacy groups.

Contention

Notably, AB 596 raises questions of balance between workplace safety and employer discretion. Although it enforces health standards aimed at protecting workers, some opponents may argue it constrains employers' ability to determine and manage their health and safety strategies. Moreover, as the bill mandates that local agencies do not require reimbursement for compliance, some stakeholders might contend that this could impose additional burdens on local agencies that oversee these regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB345

Apprenticeship programs: approval process.

CA AB1489

Peace officers.

CA AB1362

Foreign labor contractor registration: agricultural workers.

CA AB277

Behavioral health centers, facilities, and programs: background checks.

CA AB671

Accelerated restaurant building plan approval.

CA AB960

Patient visitation.

CA SB401

Political Reform Act of 1974: state employees: financial interests.

CA SB283

Energy storage systems.