California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB615

Introduced
2/13/25  
Refer
3/13/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  
Refer
4/8/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/1/25  
Refer
5/6/25  
Report Pass
5/21/25  
Engrossed
5/27/25  

Caption

Power facilities: emergency response and action plans.

Impact

The bill amends existing laws to require a significant enhancement in how energy storage facilities are planned and operated. It ensures that any prospective energy storage system includes systematic emergency response strategies and that the financial burden of developing these plans falls on the applicant. This measure aims to increase safety and reliability for both the facilities and surrounding communities. By doing so, the bill seeks to minimize risks associated with energy storage and improve proactive responses during emergencies, thereby enhancing public safety.

Summary

Assembly Bill 615, introduced by Assembly Member Davies, mandates that applications for energy storage systems submitted to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission must include comprehensive emergency response and action plans. These plans are crucial as they detail how potential emergencies would be managed and require input from local emergency management and first response agencies. The bill emphasizes the importance of integrating safety measures and appropriate feedback from local bodies to ensure that emergency preparedness aligns with established standards, specifically the National Fire Protection Association 855 Standard regarding facility setbacks.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around AB 615 appears to be supportive, as it aims to fortify safety measures related to energy storage systems. Stakeholders, particularly in the local emergency management sector, welcome the inclusion of proactive planning that can mitigate risks. However, there may also be concerns regarding the financial implications for applicants required to develop and fund these plans, as it could present additional barriers for new energy storage projects, especially for smaller entities.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounds the responsibility for financing the emergency response plans, which mandates that applicants cover costs. This stipulation may be debated as stakeholders assess whether it could unduly burden developers, particularly smaller businesses or community-focused initiatives. Additionally, while the bill strengthens safety protocols, it may lead to discussions on balancing regulatory compliance with promoting innovation and investment within the energy sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05507

An Act Concerning Certain Proceedings Relating To Electric Transmission Lines And The Membership And Processes Of The Connecticut Siting Council.

CT HB07206

An Act Concerning Proceedings Of The Siting Council And Other Requirements Concerning Certain Utility Expenditures.

PA HB425

In service and facilities, providing for pipeline safety.

DC B25-0750

Harmonious Living Amendment Act of 2024

CA AB1533

Electricity.

CT SB00462

An Act Concerning Power Plant Safety.

VA HB715

Tribal Nations; consultation w/ federally recognized, permits and review w/ potential impacts.

VA HB715

Tribal Nations; consultation w/ federally recognized, permits and review w/ potential impacts.