California Assembly Bill AB65

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/3/24
• Refer: 2/3/25
• Report Pass: 3/13/25
• Refer: 3/13/25
• Report Pass: 4/23/25
• Refer: 4/23/25
• Refer: 5/14/25
• Report Pass: 5/23/25
• Engrossed: 5/29/25
• Refer: 5/29/25
• Refer: 6/11/25

Caption

An act to amend Sections 44965, 45193, 87766, and 88193 of the Education Code, relating to employees.

Impact

If enacted, AB 65 will significantly alter the existing protocols under which schools and community colleges govern employee leaves of absence. The new provisions will ensure that these leaves are specifically termed as paid disability and parental leave, promoting uniformity across districts in California. Additionally, this legislation aims to protect the health insurance coverage of employees during their leave, ensuring that group health benefits remain unchanged during the absence, which is expected to provide peace of mind for those going through significant health challenges associated with pregnancy.

Summary

Assembly Bill 65, introduced by Assembly Member Aguiar-Curry, aims to amend sections of the California Education Code concerning the leave policies for school and community college employees. The bill mandates that public school employers provide up to 14 weeks of paid leave for certificated and classified employees who need to be absent due to pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery from related conditions. The intention of this legislation is to formalize and enhance the leave entitlements of educators and employees in the educational sector during critical times of personal health related to reproduction.

Conclusion

With AB 65's proposal to eliminate certain previous discretionary powers granted to governing boards for policy-making regarding employee leaves, it aims to create a powerful framework that advocates for the rights of educators across California. By making these provisions mandatory and protecting health benefits, the bill stands to positively affect many employees and sets a standard for parental leave in educational sectors.

Contention

The bill has the potential to meet resistance given its implications for budgetary protocols in local school districts. Funding for substitute teachers during the extended leave periods will be a consideration. Further, while advocates argue that the bill protects and empowers educators during crucial life events, detractors may contend that it could place undue financial strain on school budgets which are often tightly managed. Moreover, there may be concerns regarding the balance of administrative load for human resources departments tasked with adapting to these increased entitlements.