Planning and zoning: housing element: regional housing needs allocation.
Impact
The most significant change introduced by AB 650 is the extension of the timeline for determining existing and projected housing needs from two years to three years before scheduled revisions of the housing element. Furthermore, the bill stipulates deadlines for consultation between the HCD and councils of governments in this evaluation process. Notably, it also introduces provisions for forming subregional entities to better allocate housing needs among multiple jurisdictions, enhancing collaborative regional planning efforts to address housing shortages effectively.
Summary
Assembly Bill 650, introduced by Assembly Member Papan, focuses on amending various sections of the Government Code related to planning and zoning, specifically addressing the housing element and regional housing needs allocation. The bill mandates that every city and county in California adopts a comprehensive plan for physical development that includes a housing element. This housing element must reflect the community's long-term housing needs while ensuring that actions taken by public agencies affirmatively further fair housing. Additionally, AB 650 requires improvements to reporting formats used by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for tracking progress on housing initiatives.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 650 appears to be generally positive, indicating a shared recognition among legislators about the pressing need for housing solutions across California. Advocates argue that the bill supports more robust and well-coordinated planning efforts, which are crucial in combating the housing crisis. However, some concerns also exist regarding the increased responsibilities placed on local governments and the potential for conflicts in implementing new mandates, emphasizing a need for adequate resources and support.
Contention
While AB 650 predominantly champions collaborative housing initiatives, some points of contention arise around the implementation of new requirements and the anticipated impact on local governments' autonomy. Critics worry that the centralization of authority in the planning process may undermine local control and tailor-made solutions necessary for addressing specific community needs. Balancing state directives with local adaptation remains a core challenge as the bill progresses through legislative channels.