Broadband: state oversight.
If enacted, AB 693 will significantly amend existing laws related to broadband oversight and funding. The bill consolidates responsibilities within the Department of Broadband and Digital Equity, making it the sole authority for establishing rules and regulations governing internet service providers within California. Additionally, the bill will enhance the funding mechanisms aimed at improving broadband infrastructure, including extending the authority of the commission to administer the California Advanced Services Fund and the Broadband Loan Loss Reserve Fund. This broader scope is expected to bolster efforts to connect communities lacking adequate internet access and to streamline coordination among various stakeholders, including local governments and nonprofit organizations.
Assembly Bill 693, introduced by Assembly Member Boerner, aims to address broadband accessibility in California by establishing new oversight mechanisms and improving digital equity across the state. The bill proposes the creation of the Broadband and Digital Equity Commission, which will oversee efforts to promote universal broadband deployment, particularly in unserved and underserved areas. On July 1, 2027, it plans to repeal the current California Broadband Council, shifting its functions to the new commission, thereby focusing on increasing broadband adoption and connectivity for all Californians. Provisions allow for compensating commission members and empower the commission to appoint an executive director, who will oversee necessary operations and staffing for broadband initiatives.
Debates surrounding AB 693 may arise from concerns regarding local governance and control over broadband implementation. Proponents argue that more centralized oversight will facilitate efficient and consistent broadband deployment, preventing disparities between urban and rural areas. However, critics may assert that centralization risks diminishing local government input in addressing unique community needs, particularly in low-income neighborhoods. Additionally, there may be questions about the allocation of resources and effectiveness of the commission in genuinely representing underserved populations in discussions related to internet access and equity.