California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB697

Introduced
2/14/25  

Caption

Protected species: authorized take: State Route 37 improvements.

Impact

The bill's provisions imply a significant shift in the management of protected species, permitting the Department of Fish and Wildlife to authorize exceptions to existing prohibitions against taking these species, provided certain conditions are satisfactorily met. This includes the implementation of monitoring programs and adaptive management measures designed to mitigate the impacts of such take. The introduction of this bill raises concerns among environmental advocates who fear that it may pave the way for increased impact on vulnerable species due to ongoing and future transportation projects.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 697, introduced by Assembly Member Wilson, seeks to amend sections of the Fish and Game Code in relation to the handling of fully protected species under specific conditions. The legislation primarily allows for the incidental take of certain fully protected species that may result from transportation and restoration improvements along the State Route 37 corridor in California. This is particularly significant as it addresses the impacts of infrastructural modifications on wildlife, specifically focused on species like the salt-marsh harvest mouse and California clapper rail among others. By permitting incidental take, the bill modifies the stringent protections typically afforded to these species under existing laws.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding AB 697 focus on the balance between infrastructure development and wildlife preservation. Advocates for the bill argue that improvements to State Route 37 are essential for economic and transportation efficiency, stressing that the controlled and monitored incidental take will be managed responsibly. Conversely, opponents argue that allowing any takings of protected species undermines state and federal conservation efforts, thereby increasing risks to already vulnerable populations. The debate reflects a broader tension in California between development needs and environmental stewardship, particularly in ecologically sensitive regions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB147

Fully protected species: California Endangered Species Act: authorized take.

CA SB1231

Endangered species: take: Santa Cruz long-toed salamander.

CA SB495

Protected species: blunt-nosed leopard lizard: taking or possession.

CA AB2640

Fully protected species: Lost River sucker and shortnose sucker limited take authorization: California condor limited take authorization.

CA AB550

The California Endangered Species Act: the California State Safe Harbor Agreement Program Act.

CA AB1183

California Desert Conservation Program.

CA SB473

California Endangered Species Act.

CA SB145

Environmental mitigation: Department of Transportation.