California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB715

Introduced
2/14/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
5/12/25  
Refer
5/12/25  
Report Pass
5/14/25  
Refer
5/14/25  
Refer
5/21/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  

Caption

Educational equity: discrimination.

Impact

This bill specifically seeks to amend the Education Code to clarify definitions related to nationality and religion, which could significantly expand the protections for students within California's public education system. Furthermore, by addressing sensitive services in the context of attorney conduct, the bill introduces new guidelines that prevent actions against attorneys based on discriminatory laws from other jurisdictions. This may therefore limit the ability of the State Bar to impose disciplinary actions on lawyers for events that are legal in California but could have been deemed unlawful elsewhere, which could reshape the landscape of legal practice in the state.

Summary

Assembly Bill 715, introduced by Assembly Member Zbur, addresses various issues of discrimination and professional conduct related to attorneys in California. The bill proposes amendments to existing laws to enhance educational equity and prevent discrimination against students based on various characteristics, including nationality and religion. It outlines measures to ensure that instructional materials in public schools do not perpetuate discrimination and emphasizes the responsibility of school districts and charter schools to uphold these standards. The provisions seek to create a more inclusive educational environment while setting up a framework for addressing violations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 715 appears to be mixed, with proponents likely advocating for stronger protections within the educational system and the legal profession. Supporters argue that these changes are necessary to combat discrimination effectively and create a supportive learning environment for all students. However, concerns also exist about balancing these protections with the need for accountability among legal professionals, leading to some reservations about potential implications for local governance and law enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise from the bill's broad definitions of discrimination and its approach to the State Bar's authority, particularly regarding the disciplinary actions that can be taken against attorneys. Critics might argue that such a measure could prevent necessary legal actions against attorneys who violate professional standards, creating a precedent that could undermine the integrity of the legal profession. Additionally, the imposition of new requirements on school districts could result in debates regarding the cost and practicality of implementing these regulations, particularly in terms of local agency compliance and potential financial burdens.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB699

Educational equity: immigration and citizenship status.

AZ HB2867

Antisemitism; public schools; prohibition; penalties

CA AB1078

Instructional materials and curriculum: diversity.

NJ S4262

Establishes "The CAMPUS Act: Combating Antisemitism to Mitigate Prejudice in Universities and Schools"; addresses instruction on antisemitism and antisemitic harassment, intimidation, and bullying in public schools.

KS HB2299

Substitute for HB 2299 by Committee on Education - Declaring antisemitism and antisemitic acts to be against public policy and establishing a statutory definition of such terms.

KS SB164

Prohibiting discriminatory practices on the basis of religion at public educational institutions and authorizing the attorney general to investigate violations and assess civil penalties under the Kansas act against discrimination.

CA AB2925

Postsecondary education: Equity in Higher Education Act: prohibition on discrimination: training.

CA AB1318

School safety: Safe Place to Learn Act.