California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB723

Introduced
2/14/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  

Caption

Real estate: digitally altered images: disclosure.

Impact

The impact of AB 723 on state laws is significant as it introduces new requirements for real estate professionals, adding layers of accountability to advertising practices in the sector. This change is accompanied by implications for compliance; failure to adhere could result in criminal penalties as violations of the Real Estate Law are classified as serious offenses. Although the bill does not require reimbursement of costs to local agencies, it sets a precedent for how digitally modified content must be handled across advertisements in real estate, potentially influencing practices in other sectors as well.

Summary

AB 723 aims to enhance transparency in real estate advertising by requiring real estate brokers and salespersons to disclose when images of properties have been digitally altered. Under the proposed law, advertisements that include such altered images must clearly state that the image has been modified. Moreover, if the advertisement is made online, the original, unaltered image must also be presented, either directly included or through a link. This bill seeks to empower consumers with honest representations of properties on the market, ensuring they are not misled by potentially unrealistic portrayals.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 723 appears to support greater transparency and integrity in real estate transactions, though there may be concerns among real estate professionals regarding the practicality of the requirements. Advocates argue that the bill will protect consumers from deceptive marketing tactics. However, critics might raise points about the challenges of compliance and the administrative burdens that might be imposed on small businesses within the real estate market.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise over what constitutes a 'digitally altered image' and whether the requirements could be overly restrictive. Debate could focus on the distinction between acceptable photo editing for enhancing images versus alterations that misrepresent property conditions. Additionally, there may be discussions about how this bill interacts with the existing legal framework governing advertisements and the responsibilities of real estate professionals, which could lead to further legal clarifications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB1918

Relating to the Texas Real Estate Commission and the regulation of certain real estate professionals; increasing a fee; authorizing a fee.

TX SB699

Relating to the Texas Real Estate Commission and the regulation of certain real estate professionals.

AZ HB2624

Timeshare salespersons; licensure

AZ HB2094

Real estate; definition of contiguous

CT HB07078

An Act Concerning The Removal Of Unauthorized Persons From Real Property, Continuing Education Requirements For Real Estate Licensees, Requiring A Study Of Residential Real Property Wholesaling And Revising The Title Of A Real Estate Salesperson To A Real Estate Agent.

OH SB155

Revise the real estate wholesaler law

CA AB559

Professions and vocations: contractors: home improvement contracts: prohibited business practices.

VA SB993

Real estate brokers, salespersons, and rental location agents; exemptions.