California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB728

Introduced
2/18/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  

Caption

Skin care product sales: age verification.

Impact

If enacted, AB 728 would amend the Health and Safety Code to require retailers to implement age verification methods similar to those in place for other age-restricted products such as alcohol and spray paint. This legislative move reinforces existing laws aimed at safeguarding minors from harmful substances, highlighting the significant health risks associated with inappropriate use of cosmetic products designed for adults. By requiring age verification, the bill seeks to minimize potential injuries related to skin irritation and other adverse effects that have been documented among youthful users.

Summary

Assembly Bill 728, introduced by Assembly Member Lee, aims to enhance the protection of minors by prohibiting the sale of over-the-counter anti-aging skin care products containing certain ingredients to individuals under 18 years of age without proper age verification. Specifically, the bill addresses products containing Vitamin A, its derivatives, and alpha hydroxy acids, which have been noted for causing potential harm to younger users. Supporters of the bill argue that minors should not have access to these products, emphasizing the importance of preventing unsafe usage among children, especially given the reported rise in their consumption of such items.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 728 appears to be largely positive among health advocates and concerned parents who see the need for regulations protecting children from premature exposure to potentially harmful chemicals in skin care products. Some opposition may arise from retail organizations concerned about the added responsibility and restrictions this bill could impose on sellers, as well as potential pushback from consumers who want easier access to beauty and health products.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention include the concern that such legislation may restrict personal freedoms regarding product choice. Critics might argue this bill sets a precedent for further regulations that could overly limit consumer access to a wider variety of cosmetics and skin care products. Additionally, the bill's focus on specific ingredients underscores a debate between public health interests and market freedom for the beauty industry, raising questions about how far regulations should go in regulating access to cosmetic items.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB48

Immigration enforcement: schoolsites: prohibitions on access and sharing information.

CA AB1216

Elementary and secondary education: omnibus.

TX SR120

In memory of Eugene Paul Schoch Jr.

TX SB25

Relating to abortion at or after 20 weeks post-fertilization.

TX HB2364

Relating to abortion at or after 20 weeks post-fertilization.

CA SR10

Relative to Foster Youth Awareness Month.

TX HB2

Relating to the regulation of abortion procedures, providers, and facilities; providing penalties.

TX SB1

Relating to the regulation of abortion procedures, providers, and facilities; providing penalties.