California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB772

Introduced
2/18/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Report Pass
4/10/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Refer
5/7/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
6/27/25  
Refer
6/30/25  
Refer
7/14/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Chaptered
10/11/25  

Caption

Cyberbullying: off-campus acts: model policy.

Impact

This legislation impacts state laws by instituting specific requirements for local educational agencies to confront cyberbullying that occurs outside school jurisdiction. It obligates each agency to adopt or revise policies regarding certain reported incidents by July 1, 2027, thereby formalizing legislative support for proactive measures regarding student interactions that extend beyond school boundaries. The proposed bills reflect the state's commitment to creating safe and supportive educational environments for all students, and they align with efforts to address bullying comprehensively.

Summary

Assembly Bill 772, also known as AB 772, is focused on addressing the issue of cyberbullying, specifically targeting acts that occur off-campus and outside of school hours. The bill mandates the California Department of Education to develop a model policy by June 30, 2026, which local educational agencies can adopt or modify to respond to reported acts of cyberbullying that create an intimidating or hostile educational environment. This initiative aims to provide guidance on how to handle such issues effectively while placing a strong emphasis on student well-being and educational equity.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around AB 772 is largely supportive, especially among advocates of educational equity and student mental health. Supporters view this as a necessary step in confronting the increasing prevalence of cyberbullying and fostering environments where all students can feel safe. However, some concerns were raised regarding the extent of local agency responsibilities and the potential financial implications of implementing such policies without adequate funding structures. These discussions suggested a need for careful consideration of resources and support for local educational institutions.

Contention

While AB 772 enjoys considerable support, it also faces points of contention regarding the mandated policies. Critics express concerns about the balance between ensuring student safety and overregulating local educational agencies, which may view the imposition of such policies as burdensome. The bill does clarify that local agencies are authorized but not obligated to act on such incidents, which aims to alleviate potential liability issues. However, discussions continue regarding the effectiveness of voluntary policies in significantly improving the management of off-campus bullying incidents.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA HB736

Education; policies prohibiting bullying and cyberbullying; add and revise definitions

CA HB1405

Relating to bullying and cyberbullying in public schools.

CA SB1445

Relating to bullying and cyberbullying in public schools.

CA SB149

Crime Of Cyberbullying

CA HB131

(New Title) relative to bullying and cyberbullying prevention.

CA SB341

Private elementary and secondary schools; policies relating to bullying and cyberbullying, etc.

CA HB894

Private elementary and secondary schools; policies relating to bullying and cyberbullying, etc.

CA SB265

Elementary and secondary schools or higher educational institutions; bullying and cyberbullying.

CA SB982

Providing for basic education and bullying and cyberbullying prevention and response.

CA SB780

Cyberbullying Protection Act: liability.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.