California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB849

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Refer
5/21/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/8/25  
Refer
7/8/25  
Report Pass
7/17/25  
Refer
7/17/25  
Refer
8/18/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/12/25  

Caption

Health providers: medical chaperones.

Impact

The proposed law will enforce new educational requirements for sonographers and clinical staff involved in performing sensitive examinations. Providers must inform patients of the availability of a medical chaperone through various means, including hard copies, electronic transmissions, or verbal communications. These provisions are set to be operational by January 1, 2027, indicating a transition period for health facilities to adapt to these regulations. Failure to comply will be classified as a crime, necessitating a review of current training and procedural protocols within healthcare systems.

Summary

Assembly Bill 849, introduced by Assembly Member Soria, focuses on establishing protocols for medical chaperones during sensitive examinations conducted in health facilities. The bill mandates that any provider performing sensitive examinations such as ultrasounds of genitalia, breasts, and rectal areas must offer the presence of a medical chaperone upon patient request. The aim is to provide additional support and oversight during procedures that may elicit discomfort or concern among patients, thereby enhancing patient safety and comfort.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 849 is generally supportive, particularly among advocates for patient rights and safety. Proponents argue that the introduction of medical chaperones enhances the quality of care and helps prevent potential abuse during sensitive examinations. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation of such measures, particularly how healthcare providers will manage the logistics of ensuring a chaperone is available for every sensitive examination.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention is related to the financial implications for health facilities in meeting these new requirements. While the bill states that financial reimbursement for any associated costs is not mandated, concerns have been raised about how facilities will handle potential budgetary strains due to the need for additional staffing and training. Providers might face challenges in the practical application of these regulations, especially in emergency settings where medical chaperones may not be readily available.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1644

Medi-Cal: medically supportive food and nutrition services.

CA SB257

Health care coverage: diagnostic imaging.

CA AB719

Medi-Cal: nonmedical and nonemergency medical transportation.

CA SB43

Behavioral health.

CA AB1001

Health facilities: behavioral health response.

CA AB2246

Medical Practice Act: health care providers: qualified autism service paraprofessionals.

CA AB1399

Veterinary medicine: veterinarian-client-patient relationship: telehealth.

CA SB345

Health care services: legally protected health care activities.

CA SB1184

Mental health: involuntary treatment: antipsychotic medication.

CA SB639

Medical professionals: course requirements.

Similar Bills

KY HB40

AN ACT relating to the regulation of medical imaging and radiation therapy.

MA H303

Relative to sonographers and vascular technologists

MA H3946

Regulating medical imaging and radiation therapy

CA AB934

Schoolbuses: video monitoring systems.

NC H590

Patient Safety/Med. Imaging/Radiation Therapy

NC S415

Patient Safety/Med. Imaging/Radiation Therapy

NH HB1018

Relative to the board of medical imaging and radiation therapy.

CA SB1269

Schoolbus safety: child safety alert system.