The modifications proposed in AB 87 focus on ensuring that while developers may be encouraged to provide affordable and diverse housing options, local governments maintain discretion over the approval of certain housing projects that fall outside defined parameters. By limiting density bonuses from being applied to transient lodging, the bill aims to reinforce the primary intent of the Density Bonus Law to prioritize residential developments that provide affordable housing. If enacted, it could alter how housing developments are evaluated at the municipal level, influencing the mix of new developments in urban and suburban areas.
Summary
Assembly Bill 87, introduced by Assembly Member Boerner, seeks to amend the Density Bonus Law under Section 65915 of the Government Code, specifically targeting housing development incentives. The bill aims to clarify that provisions of the law do not obligate cities or counties to approve incentives or concessions for transient lodging as a part of the housing development process. This specification suggests a shift in the interpretation of what developments can qualify for density bonuses, potentially streamlining the approval process for more traditional housing projects while placing restrictions on transient lodging, such as hotels or short-term rentals.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding AB 87 is broadly supportive among advocates for affordable housing, who appreciate the focus on limiting incentives for transient lodging to favor long-term housing solutions. However, there may be concerns from developers who see this restriction as a limitation on potential projects that could contribute to local economies through short-term lodging. The conversation indicates a careful balancing act between fostering economic growth via hospitality options while addressing urgent housing shortages.
Contention
A significant point of contention within the discussions on AB 87 centers on the balance between local control and state mandates. Some legislators and local governments may argue that restricting density bonuses could limit their ability to respond to local housing needs, particularly in tourist-heavy areas where the transient lodging market is thriving. Conversely, advocates emphasize that prioritizing affordable residential development is essential in light of housing shortages across California, echoing the pressing need for sustainable living conditions for residents.