California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB873

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/3/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/3/25  
Refer
6/11/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  

Caption

Dentistry: dental assistants.

Impact

If enacted, AB 873 is anticipated to modernize and clarify existing laws regulating dental practice in California, ensuring that dental assistants are adequately prepared for their roles while also increasing public health protections in the process. The bill outlines new timelines for training completion, requiring employers to confirm that their dental assistants complete infection control training within a defined period after hiring. This will enhance workplace safety and compliance with regulatory expectations regarding infection control procedures in dental settings.

Summary

Assembly Bill 873, introduced by Assembly Member Alanis, proposes significant amendments to the Business and Professions Code, particularly concerning the regulation of dental assistants and the requirements surrounding infection control training. The bill seeks to address access issues faced by dental professionals, including the establishment of virtual training formats for infection control courses that are currently not available in various parts of California, notably in rural and remote regions. Given the urgency of the situation, the bill is intended to take immediate effect upon passage to facilitate access to necessary training for dental assistants who could be exposed to infectious materials in their line of work.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 873 appears to be largely supportive among dental professionals and regulatory bodies who recognize the need for timely training and the modernization of outdated provisions in the Dental Practice Act. However, some concerns might arise regarding the logistics of implementing new training protocols and the potential for additional administrative burdens on dental practices, particularly small or rural offices which may already be operating under tight resources.

Contention

A notable point of contention is the requirement for a detailed application process for course providers wishing to offer training in infection control. There may be discussions regarding the sufficiency of resources for training providers to meet the new standards proposed, as well as the requirement for course evaluations by the Dental Board of California. Additionally, there are concerns about how the new requirements will affect dental practices in various regions, particularly those that have faced historical challenges in access to training and continuing education.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB481

Dentistry: dental assistants.

CA AB2242

Dentistry: dental assistants.

CA SB1453

Dentistry.

CA AB2920

Dentistry: dental schools.

CA AB1257

Dentistry: Dental Hygiene Board of California: Dental hygienists: Examinations and licensure.

CA AB2860

Licensed Physicians and Dentists from Mexico programs.

CA AB936

Dentistry: exemptions.

CA AB1395

Licensed Physicians and Dentists from Mexico Pilot Program: requirements.

CA AB1396

Licensed Physicians and Dentists from Mexico Pilot Program: requirements.

CA AB2194

Physician assistants: supervision: doctors of podiatric medicine.

Similar Bills

CA AB481

Dentistry: dental assistants.

CA AB2242

Dentistry: dental assistants.

CA SB1453

Dentistry.

CA SB607

Business and professions.

CA AB1519

Healing arts.

CA SB1482

Dental hygienists.

CA AB1704

Limited podiatric radiography permits.

CA AB1998

Dental Practice Act: unprofessional conduct.