California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB894

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
4/28/25  
Report Pass
5/14/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Engrossed
5/23/25  
Refer
5/23/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Report Pass
6/9/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Report Pass
6/19/25  
Refer
6/19/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  

Caption

General acute care hospitals: patient directories.

Impact

The implementation of AB 894 will modify the operational protocols within hospitals concerning patient information disclosure. By requiring hospitals to provide a separate document with information about the patient's right to restrict access to their directory information, the bill ensures that patients are better informed and have more control over their private health data. Importantly, the bill includes provisions for language accessibility, requiring that the provided information be available in the top five languages spoken in the hospital’s service area, thereby expanding its reach and effectiveness.

Summary

Assembly Bill 894, introduced by Assembly Member Carrillo, seeks to enhance patient privacy and control over their information within general acute care hospitals in California. Set to take effect on July 1, 2026, the bill requires hospitals to inform patients at the time of admission that they can restrict or prohibit the use of their protected health information in the hospital's patient directory. This is in alignment with existing federal law under HIPAA, which also mandates that patients be made aware of their rights regarding their private health information.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding AB 894 appears to be supportive, particularly among privacy advocates and healthcare professionals who emphasize the importance of patient autonomy and informed consent. However, some hospital administrators may express concerns regarding the potential administrative burden and challenges associated with the implementation of these new protocols. Overall, the sentiment leans towards enhancing patient rights, reflecting a growing societal emphasis on privacy in healthcare.

Contention

One point of contention highlighted by critics is the concern about the administrative implications of requiring hospitals to adopt new procedures for patient admissions. While the intention is to protect patient privacy, there may be challenges related to ensuring that all staff members are adequately trained and that the systems for providing this information are effectively implemented. Additionally, the bill's mandate that a violation of its requirements would be deemed a crime raises discussions around the balance between enforcement of privacy standards and potential over-regulation of healthcare providers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2899

General acute care hospitals: licensed nurse-to-patient ratios.

CA AB236

Health care coverage: provider directories.

CA SB233

Practice of medicine: Arizona physicians: abortions and abortion-related care for Arizona patients.

CA AB2549

Patient visitation.

CA SB45

California Acute Care Psychiatric Hospital Loan Fund.

CA AB1164

Hospitals: emergency departments: crowding score.

CA AB2271

St. Rose Hospital.

CA SB582

Health information.

CA SB1447

Hospitals: seismic compliance: Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.

CA SB963

Hospitals: self-identification procedure: human trafficking or domestic violence.

Similar Bills

CA SB402

Health care coverage: autism.

CA AB787

Provider directory disclosures.

CA AB280

Health care coverage: provider directories.

CA AB236

Health care coverage: provider directories.

CA AB2699

Hazardous materials: reporting: civil liability.

CA AB523

Telecommunications: customer right of privacy.

CA SB923

Gender-affirming care.

CT SB00426

An Act Concerning Contracts Between Health Carriers And Health Care Providers, Agents Or Vendors, Participating Provider Directories And Surprise Bills.