California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB930

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
3/28/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
3/28/25  
Report Pass
4/21/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Refer
4/22/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Refer
5/5/25  
Report Pass
5/14/25  
Engrossed
5/19/25  
Refer
5/20/25  

Caption

Elections and voting procedures.

Impact

Additionally, the bill introduces modifications in the recount process. Voters will now have the ability to specify the recount method and the order in which ballots are recounted. This change aims to enhance transparency and improve the ability for voters to verify and challenge election outcomes effectively. The legislation mandates that voters requesting a recount must also reimburse counties for the costs associated with the recount board, which raises questions about financial barriers for individuals seeking to challenge election results.

Summary

Assembly Bill 930, introduced by Assembly Member Ward, seeks to amend several sections of the California Elections Code to improve election and voting procedures. One of the key changes proposed by the bill is the extension of the timeline for mail-in ballots, allowing ballots to be considered timely cast if received by the election official up to 7 days post-election day, an extension from the previous 3 days. This adjustment is designed to enhance voter participation and accommodate potential delays in postal services, ensuring that more votes are counted during elections.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 930 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who value enhanced accessibility for voters. Many view the measures as a step towards greater election integrity and transparency. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the potential burdens placed on local election officials and the financial implications of requiring voters to cover recount costs. Critics argue that these requirements could deter individuals from exercising their right to a recount, especially in close races where every vote is critical.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for increased responsibilities and costs imposed on local elections officials, which could complicate the administration of recounts. As the bill elevates the duties of local election officials, there are worries about the feasibility of meeting the new requirements amidst existing challenges faced in managing election logistics. Furthermore, the juxtaposition of extended mail-in ballot timelines with robust recount protocols suggests an ongoing debate about balancing voting accessibility with electoral integrity, reflecting larger national conversations about election processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB860

Elections: vote by mail ballots.

CA AB2245

Voter registration.

AZ HB2914

Registration; signatures; audits; ballots; procedures

OH HB233

Require elector citizenship verification; revise election law

OH SB153

Require citizenship verification before an elector may vote

KS HB2053

Senate Substitute for HB 2053 by Committee on Federal and State Affairs - Providing for a presidential preference primary election on March 19, 2024, and establishing voter registration and voting procedures for such election.

VA SB884

Elections; registration, absentee voting, and conduct of election.

MN SF1191

Election administration provisions modifications