California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB933

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/10/25  

Caption

Organized residential camps: organized day camps.

Impact

If enacted, AB 933 imposes that organized residential camps and organized day camps must comply with state building standards and health regulations as determined necessary by the State Public Health Officer and the State Fire Marshal. The bill mandates that local health officers enforce these building standards within their jurisdictions, thus creating a state-mandated local program that enforces compliance with safety and operational regulations. Additionally, violations of these standards can result in misdemeanor charges, therefore increasing the accountability of camp operators. This change is significant in providing a structured regulatory environment that aims to safeguard the health and safety of campers, particularly younger children attending these camps.

Summary

Assembly Bill 933, initiated by Assembly Member Vila Faras, focuses on the regulation of organized residential camps and introduces specific definitions and standards for organized day camps. The bill seeks to amend existing laws contained in the Health and Safety Code that outline the framework for the operation, regulation, and enforcement of these camps as it relates to camper safety and welfare. One of the key changes introduced by AB 933 is the renaming of organized camps to organized residential camps, alongside the introduction of the concept of organized day camps, defined as facilities that cater to groups of children with a set schedule and educational or recreational objectives. The bill notably establishes that organized day camps must provide programming for children aged 3 to 17, must operate for a minimum duration of three hours daily over five days, and must adhere to established health standards.

Contention

However, the bill does raise potential points of contention regarding increased regulatory oversight and the burden placed on local agencies. Critics may argue that imposing state-harmonized regulations could stifle the unique practices and needs of individual camps, particularly those designed for specialized or diverse populations. There is also a noted provision in the bill that states that certain costs mandated by the act to local agencies for implementation will not be reimbursed, which may raise concerns about the financial impact on local programs tasked with enforcing these new regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB275

Alcohol and drug treatment: youth.

CA AB3313

Mandatory training: employment laws.

CA SB445

Alcohol and drug treatment: youth.

CA AB2306

Foster care: Independent Living Program.

CA AB2923

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District: transit-oriented development.

CA SB408

Foster youth with complex needs: regional health teams.

CA AB1556

Foster care: automobile insurance.

CA AB500

Local planning: coastal development: streamlined permitting.