California Assembly Bill AB965

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/25
• Refer: 3/10/25
• Report Pass: 3/18/25
• Refer: 3/19/25
• Report Pass: 4/10/25
• Refer: 4/21/25
• Report Pass: 4/21/25
• Refer: 4/22/25
• Report Pass: 4/29/25
• Refer: 4/29/25
• Report Pass: 5/14/25
• Engrossed: 5/23/25
• Refer: 5/23/25
• Refer: 6/4/25
• Report Pass: 6/25/25
• Refer: 6/25/25
• Enrolled: 7/10/25
• Chaptered: 7/28/25
• Passed: 7/28/25

Caption

An act to add Section 21212.

Impact

This legislation aims to enhance safety regulations concerning electric bicycles, particularly those classified as class 3 due to their higher speed capabilities. By restricting access to younger individuals, the bill intends to reduce the risk of accidents or misuse that could arise from underage operation of fast electric bicycles. The addition of this infraction marks a shift in regulatory focus, emphasizing the state’s responsibility in ensuring safe practices among younger riders.

Summary

Assembly Bill 965, introduced by Assemblymember Dixon, focuses on electric bicycles by adding a new section to the Vehicle Code that prohibits the sale of class 3 electric bicycles to individuals under the age of 16. A class 3 electric bicycle is defined as one that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling and necessitates a speedometer. The bill imposes an infraction penalty for violations, with fines not exceeding $250.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 965 appears to be supportive among lawmakers focused on youth safety and responsible bicycle use. There seems to be a consensus that while promoting sustainable transportation is important, it must be balanced with adequate safety measures for younger riders. However, opposition may arise from those who view age-based restrictions as overly limiting for responsible young individuals who may benefit from using electric bicycles.

Contention

A notable point of contention could emerge regarding the implications of this law on personal freedoms and local economies that sell electric bicycles. Some stakeholders may argue that the restrictions could hurt businesses reliant on sales to younger demographics or view the measure as an unnecessary government regulation. Furthermore, considering the existing prohibition against individuals under 16 operating such bicycles, critics may question the effectiveness of placing additional restrictions on sales as opposed to focusing on proper education and training for young riders.