California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB988

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
3/10/25  

Caption

Pupil instruction: statewide dual enrollment framework: advisory board.

Impact

The proposed changes through AB 988 are expected to have significant impacts on California's education system as they aim to create structured pathways for students transitioning from high school to higher education. The bill outlines objectives that include streamlining dual enrollment efforts across various education sectors and consulting successful dual enrollment models from both in-state and out-of-state programs. The task force is expected to identify best practices, funding needs, and support mechanisms to ensure local educational agencies can effectively implement dual enrollment programs. Additionally, the dual enrollment advisory board will play a key role in shaping the framework and ensuring periodic evaluations of its effectiveness are conducted.

Summary

Assembly Bill 988, introduced by Assembly Member Fong, aims to enhance participation in dual enrollment programs among high school students in California. The bill proposes the establishment of the Dual Enrollment Framework Task Force, which will be responsible for creating a statewide dual enrollment framework designed to provide universal access to these courses for all public high school pupils. The overarching goal is to ensure every student graduates with a minimum of 12 units of college credit by the 2029-2030 academic year. The bill seeks to implement recommendations that improve educational pathways from high school to community colleges, which is seen as a critical factor in enhancing graduation rates and career readiness for students.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 988 appears to be positive among many educational stakeholders, particularly those supportive of increased access to dual enrollment opportunities as a means to facilitate college readiness and improve graduation outcomes. The bill's proponents argue that expanding dual enrollment programs provides students with critical exposure to college-level coursework and prepares them for postsecondary education. However, some concerns have been raised about the implementation logistics, including funding and resources needed for local educational agencies to effectively roll out these programs without compromising quality.

Contention

Discussion surrounding the bill includes various points of contention, particularly related to the funding implications and the operational capabilities of local educational agencies. There is a clear recognition that while the goals of AB 988 are commendable, the actual execution will depend largely on the state's ability to allocate sufficient funding and resources, as well as ensuring that qualified instructors are available to teach dual enrollment courses. Critics of previous attempts at similar reforms have emphasized the necessity of addressing infrastructure and support elements that can hinder the effectiveness of dual enrollment initiatives.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB95

California Education Interagency Council.

CA SB835

Pupil instruction: Cambridge International Education programs.

CA SB845

Pupil instruction: career technical education, career education, and apprenticeships.

CA AB1122

Pupil instruction: dual enrollment.

CA AB401

California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program: annual adjustment: renewal grants.

CA AB1217

Public postsecondary education: admissions standards and criteria.

CA SB423

Inmate labor: Enhancing Workforce Development for Incarcerated Firefighters Act.

CA AB323

Strong Workforce Program: work-based learning opportunities.