California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1130

Introduced
2/17/26  
Refer
2/26/26  
Report Pass
3/26/26  
Refer
4/6/26  
Report Pass
3/26/26  
Refer
4/6/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/22/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/27/26  
Engrossed
5/27/26  

Caption

Invasion of privacy: wearable recording devices.

Impact

If enacted, SB1130 would bring significant changes to existing privacy laws, namely by formally incorporating the regulation of wearable recording devices into the Business and Professions Code and the Penal Code. Violations of these provisions could result in fines up to $1,500 or misdemeanor imprisonment. Moreover, the bill also prohibits the selling or manufacturing of technology that can disable indicators on these devices that signal when they are recording, thereby promoting transparency in recording activities.

Summary

SB1130, introduced by Senator Reyes, focuses on the regulation of wearable recording devices to enhance privacy protections in California. The bill emphasizes that individuals are prohibited from using such devices to capture audio or video in areas where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as places of business, without explicit consent. This aims to address growing concerns about privacy violations through unregulated recording capabilities in public and private spaces.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1130 appears to be cautiously supportive among those advocating for individual privacy rights. Privacy advocates argue that the bill appropriately responds to technological advancements that outpace current regulations. However, some concerns have been raised about the implications for security and surveillance within businesses, as certain businesses may view the bill as overly restrictive to their operational requirements.

Contention

Key points of contention include the balance between individual privacy rights and business interests. Some industry stakeholders argue that the blanket prohibition on recording without consent may hinder legitimate security operations and employee oversight. Moreover, the definition and scope of what constitutes a reasonable expectation of privacy continue to be debated, raising questions about how the law will be practically enforced in various business environments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA A4213

Revises civil remedies for victims of invasion of privacy due to unauthorized recording or disclosure of sexual or intimate images.

CA HB1289

criminalizing the use of small unmanned aircraft systems for the purpose of video voyeurism and the invasion of the right to privacy.

CA AB1571

Product safety: recreational water safety: wearable personal flotation devices: infants and children.

CA S3344

Upgrades crime of invasion of privacy under certain circumstances; eliminates presumption of nonimprisonment.

CA A4430

Upgrades crime of invasion of privacy under certain circumstances; eliminates presumption of nonimprisonment.

CA HB1115

Private image; create criminal offense for creation, recording or alteration of without consent of depicted individual.

CA LD808

An Act to Require School Boards and Governing Bodies of Approved Private Schools to Implement Wearable Panic Alert Systems

CA HB1329

In other offenses, further providing for the offense of invasion of privacy.

CA SF2019

A bill for an act relating to invasion of privacy, including attempts to invade privacy, and making penalties applicable.

CA SB2498

Alyssa's Law; enact to require public schools to implement a panic alert system making use of wearable panic alert devices.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.