California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB227

Introduced
1/28/25  
Refer
2/5/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/27/25  

Caption

Green Empowerment Zone for the Northern Waterfront area of the County of Contra Costa.

Impact

The bill represents a significant legislative measure to bolster local economic development initiatives by formally systematizing support for the energy industry workforce in the Northern Waterfront area. By offering a structured approach to governance and a variety of incentives, it seeks to enhance job creation and economic vitality in the included cities, which will benefit from increased participation in the Green Empowerment Zone. Furthermore, the extension of the zone's lifespan allows for long-term planning and investment in the region, pinpointing economic advantages resulting from local partnerships and investments.

Summary

Senate Bill 227, also known as the Green Empowerment Zone for the Northern Waterfront area of the County of Contra Costa, aims to extend the establishment of a Green Empowerment Zone until January 1, 2040. This bill facilitates local communities in benefiting from economic development resources tailored to leverage the region's skilled workforce in the energy sector by prioritizing access to tax incentives, grants, and loan programs. It proposes an expansion of the zone to include additional cities while ensuring governance remains representative through a broadened board of directors that includes more stakeholder groups, particularly those interested in environmental issues.

Sentiment

Overall, sentiment around SB 227 appears favorable among proponents who see the bill as a beneficial step towards rejuvenating the economy in Contra Costa County. Supporters emphasize its potential to foster collaboration among local governments and stakeholders while addressing environmental justice through representation on the governing board. Conversely, there exists a note of caution among critics who may perceive extended governmental intervention in local economic decisions as potentially cumbersome or misaligned with community needs.

Contention

Points of contention primarily revolve around the governance structure of the Green Empowerment Zone and how the inclusion of environmental justice representatives on the board could impact decision-making processes. Concerns have been raised about whether the bill's emphasis on expanded tax incentives could overshadow necessary sustainable practices. Additionally, the process by which cities can opt out of the empowerment zone could generate debate regarding local autonomy and resource allocation, sparking discussions on the adequacy of benefits versus the potential for overreach.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB844

Green Empowerment Zone for the Northern Waterfront area of the County of Contra Costa.

CA AB1171

Rape of a spouse.

CA AB1274

California Partnership for the San Joaquin Valley.

CA SB534

Green Empowerment Zone for the Salton Sea and Southeastern Desert Valleys.

CA AB940

Quantum Innovation Zones.

CA AB245

California Aerospace and Aviation Commission: establishment.

CA AB538

California Aerospace Commission: establishment.

CA AB820

State boards and commissions: seniors.