By redefining what constitutes unauthorized discharge of recycled water, SB 31 clarifies that water used to restore decorative bodies of water during storm events is permissible. It also explicitly includes food handling facilities within the scope of structures that can utilize recycled water for toilet flushing and outdoor irrigation, provided that this does not compromise food safety. This could significantly reduce demand for potable water in various nonpotable applications, thus supporting state-wide water conservation efforts. Additionally, it encourages local governments and public agencies to adopt more sustainable practices in water use and management.
Summary
Senate Bill 31, introduced by Senator McNerney, aims to amend the California Water Code to enhance the use of recycled water for nonpotable purposes. The bill outlines specifications for the use of recycled water in irrigation and sanitation applications, particularly around food handling and processing facilities. This legislative effort is part of a broader initiative to improve water quality and promote sustainable water management in California amidst ongoing concerns about water shortages and drought conditions. The bill emphasizes the importance of adhering to safety regulations, thereby protecting public health while facilitating greater reliance on recycled water resources.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding SB 31 appears to be positive, with support from various stakeholders who view the legislation as a proactive step toward improving water conservation practices in California. Proponents emphasize the need for updated regulations that align with current scientific understanding and advances in water treatment technology. However, there are underlying concerns about ensuring that public health and food safety standards are maintained, particularly in settings where recycled water may come into contact with food or the public.
Contention
Notably, while the bill aims to promote recycled water use, it also faces scrutiny regarding the potential risks associated with relaxing certain regulations. Some members of the community and advocacy groups express concern that allowing incidental amounts of spray or runoff from recycled water into outdoor eating areas could pose public health risks if not carefully managed. Additionally, there may be challenges in implementing new irrigation standards and ensuring compliance across various jurisdictions, which could lead to discrepancies in how the law is interpreted and enforced.