California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB385

Introduced
2/14/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Report Pass
6/17/25  
Refer
6/17/25  
Report Pass
7/9/25  

Caption

Peace officers.

Impact

The modifications proposed in SB 385 will directly affect the educational standards required for peace officers in California. Without the commission's requirement to adopt educational criteria, the path for the implementation of a modern policing degree program may become less definitive. The bill seeks to streamline hiring processes, especially during a period of recruitment challenges faced by law enforcement agencies. This shift could potentially lead to significant changes in how peace officers are educated and trained across the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 385, introduced by Senators Seyarto and Wahab, aims to amend Section 13511.1 of the Penal Code concerning peace officers in California. Specifically, the bill repeals the requirement for the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training to approve and adopt educational criteria for peace officers based on a report that was due from the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges. The intention behind this bill is to address and alleviate pressures surrounding law enforcement recruitment amidst evolving educational demands for peace officers. It emphasizes the necessity for immediate action by declaring the measure an urgency statute.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 385 appears to be mixed as legislative discussions highlight the urgency of recruitment needs in law enforcement. Supporters argue that the repeal of bureaucratic processes will expedite the hiring of qualified candidates in a time when many departments are struggling with staffing shortages. However, critics may raise concerns about the potential weakening of educational standards that ensure the preparedness and professionalism of law enforcement personnel.

Contention

One notable point of contention around SB 385 involves the balance between immediate recruitment needs and the long-term implications of educational standards in law enforcement. While the bill aims to resolve current staffing deficiencies, there are fears that without standardized educational criteria, the quality of training may decline, affecting public safety and officer preparedness. The legislative debate underscores a critical discussion regarding the qualifications of those entrusted with maintaining law and order in communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB852

Peace officers.

CA AB2379

Peace officers.

CA SB1122

Peace officers: educational requirements.

CA AB1839

Peace officers: education and hiring grants.

CA SB449

Peace officers: Peace Officer Standards Accountability Advisory Board.

CA AB458

Shared mobility devices: insurance.

CA AB2138

Peace officers: tribal police pilot project.

CA AB21

Peace officers: training.

CA AB459

Peace officers: Attorney General: reports.

CA AB443

Peace officers: determination of bias.

Similar Bills

CA AB458

Shared mobility devices: insurance.

CA AB2379

Peace officers.

CA AB89

Peace officers: minimum qualifications.

CA AB992

Peace officers.

CA AB1786

Community colleges: academic credit for prior military experience.

CA AB2100

CalFresh: Restaurant Meals Program.

CA AB2048

Community colleges: systemic campus reforms: sexual harassment: report.

CA AB2936

Higher Education Reconciliation Act.