California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB499

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Refer
3/26/25  
Refer
3/27/25  
Refer
4/2/25  
Refer
4/30/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/28/25  
Refer
6/5/25  
Report Pass
7/3/25  

Caption

Residential projects: fees and charges.

Impact

The proposed amendments would align local agency practices with ongoing needs for funding public improvements tied to residential developments. By permitting the earlier collection of fees, this bill could ensure that necessary services are available in a timely manner, potentially accelerating the development of infrastructure that supports new housing projects. The bill maintains safeguards by ensuring that fees do not exceed reasonable costs, hence preventing excessive financial burdens on developers.

Summary

Senate Bill 499, introduced by Senator Stern, seeks to amend Section 66007 of the Government Code concerning the fees and charges imposed by local agencies on designated residential developments. The bill aims to facilitate the earlier collection of certain utility service charges related to residential projects by allowing local agencies to collect such fees at the time of application for service, rather than waiting until the issuance of occupancy certificates. Additionally, the bill clarifies that the earlier imposition of fees is permissible for improvements related to fire, public safety, and emergency services, including parkland and recreational facilities identified in local safety plans.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB 499 appears to be supportive of the need for timely funding for public services associated with new housing. However, there may be concerns from certain stakeholders regarding the impact on developers, particularly regarding the potential for increased upfront costs that could complicate project feasibility. Overall, the bill resonates with broader goals of housing development and urban planning in alignment with community safety needs.

Contention

Key contentions that could arise from SB 499 include debates over the fairness of developmental fees and the timing of collections. While proponents argue that the changes will streamline funding for essential services, opponents may express concern about the potential strain on developers and the implications for housing affordability. The balancing act for the legislature will involve addressing local agency needs for revenue while ensuring that the housing market remains accessible and viable.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB937

Development projects: fees and charges.

CA AB2729

Development projects: permits and other entitlements.

CA SB611

Residential rental properties: fees and security.

CA AB1820

Housing development projects: applications: fees and exactions.

CA SB834

Vehicles: preferential parking: residential, commercial, or other development project.

CA SB684

Land use: streamlined approval processes: development projects of 10 or fewer residential units on urban lots under 5 acres.

CA AB1218

Development projects: demolition of residential dwelling units.

CA AB1532

Office conversion projects.

CA AB770

Residential care facilities for the elderly.

CA AB2199

California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: residential or mixed-use housing projects.

Similar Bills

CA SB937

Development projects: fees and charges.

CA AB2729

Development projects: permits and other entitlements.

CA SB4

Planning and zoning: housing development: higher education institutions and religious institutions.

CA SB597

Labor-related liabilities: direct contractor and subcontractor.

CA AB1386

Residential fees and charges.