California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB508

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Report Pass
4/7/25  

Caption

Out-of-state physicians and surgeons: telehealth: license exemption.

Impact

The passage of SB 508 could significantly alter the landscape of telehealth practice in California by improving access to healthcare for patients diagnosed with cancer and other life-threatening conditions. By allowing out-of-state physicians to provide services, the bill aims to bridge gaps in care, especially for patients who may not have immediate options nearby. This amendment reflects a growing trend toward telehealth as a means to increase healthcare accessibility and could have broader implications for how states regulate medical practice across borders.

Summary

Senate Bill 508, introduced by Senator Valladares, aims to amend Section 2052.5 of the Business and Professions Code concerning the practice of telehealth by out-of-state physicians. The bill specifically allows licensed out-of-state physicians to provide telehealth services to California patients who meet certain criteria. It modifies the definition of 'eligible patients' to include those diagnosed with any stage of cancer and clarifies that patients with life-threatening conditions are not necessarily required to participate in local clinical trials to qualify for telehealth services, thereby increasing patient access to specialized care across state lines.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 508 appears to be positive among proponents of telehealth and patient advocacy groups. They view the bill as a necessary step towards expanding healthcare access in a timely manner, especially for patients with serious conditions that require quick and specialized intervention. However, concerns may arise regarding the regulatory oversight of out-of-state practitioners and the quality of care being delivered remotely.

Contention

Debate may center on the implications of allowing out-of-state physicians to practice in California without being licensed in the state. Opponents might raise concerns about the adequacy of oversight and accountability, questioning how the Medical Board of California will ensure that these physicians maintain the same standards of care as in-state providers. Additionally, the specific criteria for patient eligibility could provoke discussions regarding patient safety and the efficacy of telehealth treatments, particularly for those with severe health conditions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

WV SB299

Modifying WV regulations on pubertal modulation, hormonal therapy, and gender reassignment

NH HB701

Relative to a health care patient's right to try certain emergency health care treatment options.

CA AB260

Sexual and reproductive health care.

WV SB167

Permitting care of patient by telemedicine across state lines

HI HB557

Relating To Telehealth.

HI SB1281

Relating To Telehealth.

MS HB573

Mississippi Helping Ensure Alternative Law Enforcement Transportation for Healing (MissHEALTH) Pilot Program; establish for mental health crisis.

NM SB252

Social Work Telehealth Services