California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB518

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Refer
4/7/25  
Refer
4/10/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Report Pass
4/23/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Refer
4/24/25  
Report Pass
5/23/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Engrossed
6/2/25  
Refer
6/16/25  
Refer
6/9/25  
Refer
6/16/25  
Report Pass
7/2/25  
Refer
7/3/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  

Caption

Descendants of enslaved persons: reparations.

Impact

The creation of the Bureau for Descendants of American Slavery signifies a considerable shift in how California addresses historical injustices related to slavery. By officially recognizing the descendants of enslaved individuals and offering a mechanism for lineage verification, SB 518 aims to ensure that any reparative measures proposed reach the intended communities. The legislation builds upon the earlier efforts of Chapter 319 of the Statutes of 2020, which sought to assess and recommend reparations for the descendants of enslaved persons.

Summary

Senate Bill 518, introduced by Senator Weber Pierson, establishes the Bureau for Descendants of American Slavery within the California Civil Rights Department. The primary purpose of this legislation is to support descendants of enslaved individuals in the United States by creating a structured means to verify their lineage and providing access to potential benefits. The bill mandates the establishment of a Genealogy Division to verify descendant status as a qualifying criterion for state benefits and outlines the formation of additional divisions focused on education and legal affairs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 518 appears to be largely supportive among lawmakers and advocacy groups advocating for reparations and social justice. However, discussions may arise in opposition, centering around the logistics and implications of implementing such a bureau, particularly about funding and the criteria for verification of descendant status. These debates underscore differing views on how reparative justice should be pursued in contemporary contexts.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the funding mechanism for the Bureau and the specifics around the verification process for descendants. While the bill emphasizes a commitment to protect personal and genetic information, privacy concerns about how the bureau handles sensitive data may also present challenges. Critics may argue about the bureaucratic complexities, potential for misuse of data, and the broader implications of establishing a state-managed body dedicated to reparations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB1013

Taxation: Property Tax Assistance for Descendants of Enslaved Persons.

CA SB1331

The Fund for Reparations and Reparative Justice.

CA SB1007

Housing: homeowner assistance: Homeowner’s Assistance for Descendants of Enslaved Persons Program.

CA AB3089

Chattel slavery: formal apology.

CA SB490

California American Freedmen Affairs Agency.

CA ACR135

Human rights violations and crimes against humanity on African slaves and their descendants.

CA SCR113

Human rights violations and crimes against humanity on African slaves and their descendants.

CA SB1403

California American Freedmen Affairs Agency.

CA SB1050

California American Freedmen Affairs Agency: racially motivated eminent domain.

CA AB3152

Excise tax: loan guaranties: education and training.

Similar Bills

CA SB1403

California American Freedmen Affairs Agency.

CA SB437

California State University: claim eligibility: genealogy and descendancy.

CA AB389

Native American repatriation: California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 2001: California State University.

CA SB490

California American Freedmen Affairs Agency.

CA AB1315

California American Freedmen Affairs Agency.