California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB549

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
3/5/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/29/25  

Caption

Second Neighborhood Infill Finance and Transit Improvements Act.

Impact

By revising existing laws, SB 549 enhances the financial mechanisms available to cities and counties, facilitating the development of vital infrastructure that supports housing and urban improvement. It mandates that a minimum of 40% of the funds from the infrastructure financing plan must be invested in housing units for households with incomes below 60% of the area median income, ensuring a clear focus on affordable housing development. The legislation prioritizes occupancy for housing funded through this bill to individuals displaced from these areas, adding a community-sensitive dimension to local development initiatives.

Summary

Senate Bill 549, known as the Second Neighborhood Infill Finance and Transit Improvements Act (NIFTI-2), proposes amendments to the Government Code, enabling enhanced infrastructure financing districts (EIFDs). This bill seeks to empower local governments to allocate property tax revenues for financing public capital facilities and specific community projects. Notably, the amendments shift focus from sales tax revenues to property tax allocations, removing the preceding requirement that a district's boundaries must align with those of the city or county establishing it. The bill stresses the necessity for the financed areas to be within one-half mile of a significant transit stop, fulfilling specific housing and community development goals.

Contention

The bill has attracted attention for its emphasis on affordable housing and infrastructure improvements. Proponents assert that it effectively addresses the housing crisis while bolstering transit-oriented development, leading to economically viable and ecologically responsible urban growth. Critics, however, may argue about potential drawbacks, highlighting concerns about fiscal management and the effectiveness of state versus local governance in managing these initiatives. Further debates may arise around the long-term implications of removing the coterminous boundaries requirement, particularly in preserving local governance and accountability in urban development.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB961

Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

CA SB563

Second Neighborhood Infill Finance and Transit Improvements Act: housing developments: homelessness prevention programs: enhanced infrastructure financing plan review and amendment process.

CA SB1389

Public investment authorities.

CA AB1568

Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

CA SB780

Local finance: public investment authorities.

CA AB417

Local finance: enhanced infrastructure financing districts: community revitalization and investment authorities.