Methane emissions: petroleum and natural gas producing low methane emissions.
The bill requires the state Air Resources Board to establish a certification standard by December 31, 2026, for petroleum and natural gas sources that produce low methane emissions. Additionally, it compels state agencies such as the Public Utilities Commission to consider modifications to existing programs that target methane reduction. The implementation of these mandates is expected to influence procurement practices across California, encouraging the purchase of certified low methane petroleum and natural gas. This shift is anticipated to support the broader goals of California's environmental policy by minimizing greenhouse gas emissions from its energy supply.
Senate Bill 613, introduced by Senator Stern, aims to enhance California's efforts to reduce methane emissions from petroleum and natural gas production. Building on the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, the bill mandates that state agencies prioritize strategies specifically targeted at decreasing methane emissions, particularly from the imported petroleum and natural gas, where feasible and cost-effective. This legislative initiative underscores the urgency of addressing methane, a short-lived climate pollutant with a substantially higher warming potential than carbon dioxide.
Overall, SB 613 represents a proactive step towards enhancing California’s environmental standards by holding the petroleum and natural gas sectors accountable for their emissions. The bill does not only focus on domestic production but also addresses the significant contributions of out-of-state sources to methane emissions in California, reflecting a comprehensive approach to the state's climate objectives.
Despite the consensus on the need to address methane emissions, there may be contention regarding the balance between environmental priorities and economic impacts on the petroleum and natural gas industries. Proponents of SB 613 argue that reducing methane emissions is vital for combating climate change, while opponents may express concerns over the economic implications for energy prices and availability in California. The bill's requirement for extensive reporting and monitoring of emissions could also be seen by some stakeholders as an administrative burden.